WEEK OF MARCH 31 THROUGH APRIL5
World Leaders All Wear Pyramid Symbols at The Hague, Why? March 31, 2014 (WND) During the Nuclear Security Summit, which was held on March 24th and 25th in the Netherlands, Reuters captured video of All-Seeing-Eye-300x300 presidents and Prime Ministers from all over the world wearing a very peculiar pyramid-shaped pin. The Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague formed the backdrop for an emergency meeting of Group of Seven leaders on Russia’s annexation of Crimea. Those that have studied secret societies and the occult know that the unholy pyramid is a very dark symbol that represents some of the deepest secrets of the elite. When it shows up in a very public forum like an international summit meeting, it is usually not by accident. When I first watched that video, it reminded me of a really bad apocalyptic movie. Except that it was real. And I find it interesting that at this same summit, Barack Obama, Chinese President Xi Jinping and most of the rest of the world leaders played a “nuclear war game.” Of course the cover story is that all of these world leaders were wearing pyramids to support “nuclear security”, kind of like if you want to support breast cancer you pin a little pink ribbon to your jacket. And you never know, perhaps that is all that this was. But when I watched this video for the first time my jaw just about hit the floor. But, world leaders including President Obama, UK Prime Minister David Cameron and Chinese President Xi Jinping played a “nuclear war game” designed to test how they would respond to a global terrorist attack at a high-level meeting, the Telegraph reported Tuesday. The leaders also included German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who according to the Telegraph was unhappy and did not want to play the game. The game took place at the nuclear summit at The Hague and included dozens of other heads of state. The game required leaders to respond to the scenario of a terrorist attack with a “dirty bomb” in a big Western city. Leaders had to answer a series of questions on how they would respond to the attack as the game progressed and new challenges arose. Let’s hope that game does not foreshadow any real events. So what is the big deal about wearing pyramids? US President Obama, upon leaving The Hague, went to visit the Pope in Rome, and from there on to visit the Saudi Arabian King in Riyadh. One can only wonder about all these secretive organizations and meetings.
WEEK OF MARCH 23 THROUGH MARCH 29
Obama Warns Putin About Invading UkraineMarch 28….(CBS) President Obama, in an interview in Rome with "CBS Evening News" anchor and managing editor Scott Pelley, said Russia must take steps now to reduce tensions over Ukraine. "It's well known and well acknowledged that you've seen a range of troops massing along that border under the guise of military exercises. But these are not what Russia would normally be doing. And, you know, it may simply be an effort to intimidate Ukraine or it may be that they've got additional plans," Obama said. To resolve and de-escalate the situation right now, Obama said Russia needs "to move back those troops and to begin negotiations directly with the Ukrainian government, as well as the international community." Mr. Obama said Russian President Vladimir Putin has been "willing to show a deeply held grievance about what he considers to be the loss of the Soviet Union." "You would have thought that after a couple of decades that there'd be an awareness on the part of any Russian leader that the path forward is not to revert back to the kinds of practices that, you know, were so prevalent during the Cold War but, in fact, to move forward with further integration with the world economy and to be a responsible international citizen." Mr. Obama said Putin considers the breakup of the Soviet Union to be "tragic." "There's a strong sense of Russian nationalism and a sense that somehow the West has taken advantage of Russia in the past and that he wants to, in some fashion, reverse that or make up for that. "What I have repeatedly said is that he may be entirely misreading the West," Obama continued. "He's certainly misreading American foreign policy. We have no interest in encircling Russia and we have no interest in Ukraine beyond letting the Ukrainian people make their own decisions about their own lives." He continued, "And it is true that we reject the notion that there is a sphere of influence along the Russian border that then justifies Russia invading other countries. Certainly they're going to have influence because of trade and tradition and language and heritage with Ukraine. Everybody acknowledges that. But there's a difference between that and sending in troops, and because you're bigger and stronger taking a piece of the country, that is not how international law and international norms are observed in the 21st century." Asked about the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's response and whether NATO is a hollowed-out force, Obama made the point that it is up to all of the NATO allies to contribute, including Germany, Britain and others, in order to have a credible force as a counterweight against Putin's Russia, according to Pelley. Eighty-five percent of US forces have been removed from Europe since 1989. The US formerly had 400,000 troops there, and now only about 50,000 troops remain. Obama wouldn't be specific about what the US would do if Russia pushed further into Ukraine, but he did say that there would be more economic sanctions brought to bear, not just by the US but by the world community. The latest CBS News poll shows that 46 percent of Americans disapprove of the way President Obama is handling the Ukraine situation, compared with 38 percent who approve. Fifty-six percent of American approve of the sanctions leveled against Russia by the US and other European countries, but 65 percent don't think the US should provide military aid and weapons to Ukraine. In addition, 57 percent of Americans think the situation in Crimea is beyond the control of the US However, Pelley noted on "CBS This Morning" that broad international condemnation of Russia's invasion of Crimea has buoyed the presidents hopes of resolving the conflict. "On Thursday, a vote at the United Nations and 100 countries to 11 voted in favor of a resolution that condemned the invasion of Crimea, so the president really feels he has the backing of the rest of the world, and he hopes that these economic sanctions will be enough to deter Putin."
Sailors Leaving Navy over Stress on Social Issues March 28….(In The Days) US Navy Cmdr. Guy Snodgrass, until recently a Pentagon speech writer for the chief of naval operations, Adm. Jonathan Greenert, said sailors are becoming fed-up with the constant emphasis on social issues, an apparent reference to gays in the military, women in combat and ending sexual harassment. “Sailors continue to cite the over-focus on social issues by senior leadership, above and beyond discussions on war fighting, a fact that demoralizes junior and mid-grade officers alike,” Cmdr. Snodgrass wrote this month on the US Naval Institute website, an independent forum for active and retired sailors and Marines. It is a remarkably frank assessment from an upwardly mobile fighter pilot who is due to become the executive officer of a F-18 unit in Japan. He says one troubling sign already has emerged: a drop in applications to the US Naval Academy in Annapolis last year. “The US Navy has a looming officer retention problem,” Cmdr. Snodgrass writes, adding there is an “erosion of trust in senior leadership.” He says retention racked up its “worst year in history” for the special warfare community, including Navy SEALs, with a record number of lieutenants declining to stay. The aviation side had a goal of 45 percent “take rate” on retention bonuses, but got only 36 percent. “Unfortunately,” Cmdr. Snodgrass says in his 24-page study, “the fact that a growing number of quality officers have already left the service or are planning to head for the doors seems to be going undetected by senior leadership.” He lists long wartime deployments as a leading retention negative. He also tackles a touchier issue, what some sailors have referred to as “political correctness,” such as the banning of uniform patches that might offend someone. Cmdr. Snodgrass writes of “a recent shift within the Navy to eradicate behavior that is, by its every nature, ineradicable.” “Put simply, there is no dollar amount that can be spent, or amount of training that can be conducted, that will completely eradicate complex issues such as suicide, sexual assault, or commanding officer relief for cause, yet we continue to expend immense resources in this pursuit,” he says. “Sailors are bombarded with annual online training regarding sexual orientation sensitivity.
Obama to Kill America’s Tomahawk, Hellfire Missile Programs(Cornerstone of US Naval power eliminated under Obama budget) March 26….(Washington Free Beacon) President Barack Obama is seeking to abolish two highly successful missile programs that experts say have helped the US Navy maintain military superiority for the past several decades. The Tomahawk missile program, known as “the world’s most advanced cruise missile,” is set to be cut by $128 million under Obama’s fiscal year 2015 budget proposal and completely eliminated by fiscal year 2016, according to budget documents released by the Navy. In addition to the monetary cuts to the program, the number of actual Tomahawk missiles acquired by the United States would drop significantly, from 196 last year to just 100 in 2015. The number will then drop to zero in 2016. The Navy will also be forced to cancel its acquisition of the well-regarded and highly effective Hellfire missiles in 2015, according to Obama’s proposal. The proposed elimination of these missile programs came as a shock to lawmakers and military experts, who warned ending cutting these missiles would significantly erode America’s ability to deter enemy forces. “The administration’s proposed budget dramatically under-resources our investments in munitions and leaves the Defense Department with dangerous gaps in key areas, like Tomahawk and Hellfire missiles,” said Rep. Randy Forbes (R., Va.), a member of House Armed Services Committee. “Increasing our investment in munitions and retaining our technological edge in research and development should be a key component of any serious defense strategy,” he said. The US Navy relied heavily on them during the 2011 military incursion into Libya, where some 220 Tomahawks were used during the fight. Nearly 100 of these missiles are used each year on average, meaning that the sharp cuts will cause the Tomahawk stock to be completely depleted by around 2018. This is particularly concerning to defense experts because the Pentagon does not have a replacement missile ready to take the Tomahawk’s place. “It doesn’t make sense,” said Seth Cropsey, director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for American Seapower. “This really moves the US away from a position of influence and military dominance.” Cropsey said that if someone were trying to “reduce the US ability to shape events” in the world, “they couldn’t find a better way than depriving the US fleet of Tomahawks. It’s breathtaking.” The Navy has used various incarnations of the Tomahawk with great success over the past 30 years, employing them during Desert Storm and its battle zones from Iraq and Afghanistan to the Balkans. While the military as a whole is seeing its budgets reduced and equipment scaled back, the Tomahawk cuts do not appear to be due to a lack of funds. The administration seems to be taking the millions typically spent on the Tomahawk program and investing it in an experimental missile program that experts say will not be battle ready for at least 10 years. “It is definitely short-sighted given the value of the Tomahawk as a workhorse,” said Mackenzie Eaglen, a former Pentagon staffer who analyzes military readiness. “The opening days of the US lead-from-behind, ‘no-fly zone’ operation over Libya showcased how important this inventory of weapons is still today.” Overall, the Navy has essentially cut in half its weapons procurement plan, impacting a wide range of tactical weapons and missiles. Navy experts and retired officials fear that the elimination of the Tomahawk and Hellfire systems, and the lack of a battle-ready replacement will jeopardize the US Navy’s supremacy as it faces increasingly advanced militaries from North Korea to the Middle East. The cuts are “like running a white flag up on a very tall flag pole and saying, ‘We are ready to be walked on,’” Cropsey said. Retired Army Lt. Col. Steve Russell called the cuts to the Tomahawk program devastating for multiple reasons. “We run a huge risk because so much of our national policy for immediate response is contingent on our national security team threatening with Tomahawk missiles,” said Russell. “If our national policy is contingent on an immediate response with these missiles and we’re not replacing them, then what are we going do?” Russell asked.
FOJ Note:It can be tough trying to build a One World Order, and attempting to fashion a
Global government. All of these events exemplified in the news below are
affecting the structuring of an economic global union, and merely highlight the
fact that even after the Globalists succeed in organizing a superstructure for
the eventual Antichrist, there will still be some alienation amongst the final
Ten members. Old Testament prophets Daniel and Ezekiel reveal that Russia and
the Kings of the East will ultimately oppose the Antichrist and His World
Kingdom, and counter his moves in the Middle East, especially in Israel.
March 25….(Newsmax)
The world's leading
industrial powers threatened further sanctions to deter the Kremlin from
invading other parts of Ukraine and boycotted what was to be a Group of Eight
summit hosted by President Vladimir Putin. Meeting for the first time since last
week's annexation of Crimea by Russia, Group of Seven leaders said they won't
attend the planned G-8 meeting which was to have to been held in Sochi, site of
the Winter Olympics, and will instead hold their own summit in June in Brussels.
"We remain ready to intensify actions including coordinated sectoral sanctions
that will have an increasingly significant impact on the Russian economy, if
Russia continues to escalate this situation," the G-7 said in a statement e-
mailed after a meeting in The Hague today. Both sides in
Ukraine's crisis spent the day calculating what to do next, with Russia
consolidating its control over Crimea and massing forces along the border with
Ukraine in the most serious confrontation between Moscow and the US and its
allies since the demise of the Soviet Union. "We're united in imposing a cost on
Russia for its actions so far," President Barack Obama told reporters in
Amsterdam earlier today at the start of a six-day trip that includes a
nuclear-security summit in The Hague and a meeting with the heads of European
Union institutions in Brussels. The G-7,
the US, Germany, the UK, France, Italy, Canada and Japan, went back to its Cold
War-era format, suspending what became the G-8 in 1998 when Russia was welcomed
in. The group was all smiles around a Putin-less conference table in a photo
posted on Twitter by European Commission President Jose Barroso, who attended
along with EU President Herman Van Rompuy. "It's Russia that needs to change
course," UK Prime Minister David Cameron told reporters. US and
European warnings focused on potential military moves by the Kremlin into
Russian-speaking areas of eastern and southern Ukraine, leaving open whether the
West hopes to dislodge Putin's forces from Crimea, a Black Sea peninsula
dominated by Russia since the 18th century. The US has imposed asset freezes and
visa bans on 31 Russian and Ukrainian political and business figures close to
Putin and barred Bank Rossiya. The 28-nation EU has put 51 on the blacklist,
including some on the US list, while stopping short of punishing businesspeople.
"The current sanctions are still too little to matter, but that's not by
accident, it's by design," said Fredrik Erixon, director of the European Centre
for International Political Economy in Brussels. "The EU and US are sitting on
weapons of mass destruction when it comes to Russia's economy. The US and EU are
laying out possible step-by-step economic sanctions that will start rolling into
place if Putin doesn't behave." US and European officials said sanctions are
already biting. Russia's Micex stock index has plunged 14 percent this year,
faring worse than the 5 percent decline of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The
ruble has dropped 8.9 percent, making it the second-worst performer against the
dollar among 24 developing-market currencies tracked by Bloomberg. "As long as
Russia is flagrantly violating international law and the order the G-7 has
helped to build since the end of the Cold War, there's no need for the G-7 to
engage with Russia," Deputy US National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes told
reporters. Russia wants
Ukraine to adopt a federal constitution that guarantees political and military
neutrality, grants powers to Ukrainian regions and makes Russian a second
official language. In a nod to those concerns, the G-7 urged Ukraine to
undertake "broad-based constitutional reform, free and fair presidential
elections in May, promotion of human rights and respect of national minorities."
Putin didn't show his hand today, instead using a public appearance in Moscow to
tout Russia's sporting prowess, urge more support for slopestyle and halfpipe
snowboarding, and announce that the Sochi Olympics came in under budget. Putin
sent Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to The Hague for a 53-nation summit on the
security of the world's stockpiles of nuclear fuel. Lavrov told reporters that
Russia isn't "clinging" to the G-8 format, viewing the wider Group of 20 as the
best forum for discussing global issues. March
25….(Newsmax) Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov suggested on Monday that
the Group of Eight industrialised nations may have outlived its purpose,
sounding a defiant note after some G8 leaders said the gathering's next meeting
in Russia should be cancelled. "If our Western partners believe the format has
exhausted itself, we don't cling to this format. We don't believe it will be a
big problem if it doesn't convene," Lavrov told reporters in The Hague, where G7
leaders are meeting without Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the
crisis in Ukraine. Following
Russia's annexation of the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, the G7 has suspended
preparations for a G8 summit that had been scheduled to be held in Russia's
Black Sea resort of Sochi in June. Britain and Germany have also warned that
Russia could face permanent exclusion from the G8 if the Kremlin took further
steps against Ukraine. Lavrov said
many of the world's main diplomatic and economic crises were already addressed
through other formats, citing among others the quartet of Middle East
negotiators that has tried to work towards peace between Israel and the
Palestinians, and six-power talks with Iran over its contested nuclear program
in which Russia participates. "Many issues are discussed at that platform (G8)
but by and large there are many other platforms," he said. "The G8 is an
informal club. No one hands out membership cards and no one can be kicked out of
it," he said. Lavrov accused G7 leaders of grandstanding for domestic audiences
when discussing excluding Russia from the group. "It is about joint work, not
about someone capitalizing on someone else when needed or ignoring someone when
they want to make a public gesture for the sake of some domestic political
considerations of theirs," he said. March 25….(Newsmax)
Malaysia said on Monday that a missing jetliner had crashed into the Indian
Ocean, an announcement that was greeted with hysteria by Chinese relatives of
those on board and a demand by China that Kuala Lumpur share all the evidence it
had on the incident. Citing groundbreaking satellite-data analysis by the
British company Inmarsat, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said that
Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, which vanished more than a fortnight ago while
flying to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur, had crashed thousands of miles away in the
southern Indian Ocean. His statement may go some way toward tamping down some of
the more fevered speculation about the plane's fate, including one theory some
grief-stricken relatives had seized on: that the plane had been hijacked and
forced to land somewhere. All 239 people on board were presumed dead, airline
officials said on Monday.
Najib's announcement opens the way for what could be one of the
most costly and challenging air crash investigations in history. The launch of
an official air crash investigation would give Malaysia power to coordinate and
sift evidence, but it may still face critics, especially China, which had more
than 150 citizens on board the missing plane and has criticized Malaysia over
the progress of the search. The Inmarsat data showed the Boeing 777's last
position was in the Indian Ocean west of Perth, Australia, Najib said in a
statement. "This is a remote location, far from any possible landing sites," he
said. "It is therefore, with deep sadness and regret, that I must inform you
that, according to this new data, Flight MH370 ended in the southern Indian
Ocean." Chinese
Deputy Foreign Minister Xie Hangsheng immediately demanded all relevant
satellite-data analysis from Malaysia that demonstrated how Malaysia had reached
its conclusion about the fate of the jet. None of the parties involved in
the multinational search for the plane, Chinese, Australian or Malaysian, was
yet willing to offer an explanation for how the doomed flight came to be in the
place where it went down March 24….(WND)
Arab countries in the Middle East widely expect Syrian President Bashar al-Assad
to win the rebel-led insurgency that has been targeting his regime for the last
three years, thereby strengthening Russia’s presence in the region. The
anticipated victory will further solidify the position of the large Russian Navy
fleet docked at Syria’s Tartus port. That position is more strategic now that
Russia has seized the Ukrainian naval headquarters located in Sevastopol, where
Moscow stationed its Black Sea Fleet. Control of both the Tartus and
Sevastopol ports provides Russia, under President Vladimir Putin, with open
access to the Mediterranean, the Indian Ocean and beyond for both military
and energy needs. Russia and Iran have been the biggest
state backers of Assad, while the US and moderate Arab countries worked to aid
the rebels fighting to topple the Syrian president. Ahead of the Arab summit in
Kuwait this week, Sunni Arab countries are operating under the working
assumption that Assad’s regime is no longer in danger and that the Syrian
president will be able to quell the rebellion, Egyptian security officials told
WND. In a major blow to the rebels, the security officials said Qatar has made a
dramatic about face and is now ready to help Assad with finances to reconstruct
Syria. Qatar previously worked with Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab
Emirates to arm and aid the Syrian rebels. According to
reports, Assad already rid Damascus of rebels and has retaken scores of rebel
strongholds. His victories were aided by instances of infighting within the
rebel ranks, including the open rebellion of several rebel factions allied with
al-Qaida. The Egyptian security officials said Assad still faces pockets of
resistance, particularly in the city of Daraa near the Jordanian border and in
the north toward the Syrian border with Turkey. These locations contain
important supply roads for arms transports to the rebels. Another rebel
stronghold is located near the Syrian border with Israel, the scene of clashes
in recent days. March
24….(Global Research) The Ukrainian crisis? It is basically the opposite of
what the media and politicians keep repeating both in the US and Europe. They
say that the so-called International community has isolated Russia and Vladimir
Putin. In fact it is the real sponsors of the coup d’état and the violence in
Ukraine who are isolated not only morally but also strategically. And it is
Putin, the first leader who resisted and defeated the strategy of world
domination, that is enjoying the enthusiastic support of his people and the
growing admiration of the world. The well financed media and politicians do not
want to hear this, but this is the reality. Without exaggeration, one can
compare this resistance to that against Napoleon and Hitler. Only few know
precisely how dangerous the situation has been. How close to a real war. The
incompetent representatives of the ‘international community’ lost any sense of
reality and deployed the weapons of social destabilization, armed insurrection,
assassination by snipers, a fascist March on Kiev reminiscent of Mussolini’s
March on Rome, targeting of the Russian population. They intended to give Russia
the Libya treatment, and they did not make a secret of it. After the
assurances given by George H W Bush to Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO couldn’t be
used for a push toward East, successive US governments did exactly that.
Their objective was to surround Russia.
The fascist
armed insurrection and the Kiev coup were not simply a war against Russia, they
were also a war against Europe. Not the EU bureaucracy in Brussels, whose
loyalty lies with the big financial institutions, but the Europe of the various
countries reduced to misery and despair by austerity measures and the economic
looting of Wall Street and the city of London. Ukraine has been destabilized in
order to make sure that Europe would be in a perennial war with Russia. In fact,
both, the interests of Europe and that of Russia, lie in a common economic plan
for the development of the whole area. This is what was proposed by Putin and by
several leaders such as former German chancellors Helmut Kohl and Gerhard
Schroeder. The most important point to understand is that this war and looting
policy is not in the interest of the Europeans or even of the Americans. This is the
big secret that now cannot be covered over anymore. The governments of the US
and the European countries are NOT independent entities, they are not sovereign.
They do not have the will or even the ability to act on behalf of their people.
They are controlled by powerful banking interests. They have been taken
over by two financial centers that do not care for the real economy. They pursue
only speculation and looting. In response on March 4th the economic adviser to
Putin, Sergey Glazyev declared openly that if the financial vultures persisted,
Russia would create on the spot an independent financial system which is
separate from that of the US Dollar. Russia has
a different plan from the Globalists. They are building a way to eliminate
any dependence on the US but also profit from these sanctions. If sanctions are
applied against Russia’s state structures, they will have to move into other
currencies and create their own settlement system. They will be forced to
recognize the impossibility of repayment of the loans that the US banks gave to
Russian state structures. Indeed, sanctions are a double-edged weapon, and if
the US chooses to freeze assets, then their equities and liabilities in dollars
will also be frozen.’ This strategy is known as the Financial Nuclear Option.
It could lead to the end of the predatory looting
system of Wall Street.. The ‘Southern and Eastern partners’
Russia is talking about are clearly the members of the BRICS, Brazil, Russia,
India, China, South Africa, the sane part of the world economy, the future. And
it is exactly what the official spokesman of the Kremlin, Dmitry Peskov
indicated in an interview to the BBC: “Sanctions against Russia could be the
final trigger that will force many countries to create a new independent
financial system based on the real economy. The world is changing rapidly. How
many civilizations grew and died in the course of history? Who will be able to
resist the pressure of dying systems and indicate to the people the road toward
the future?” The possibility of a new financial system independent from the
collapsing dollar empire, as consequence of anti Russia sanctions was also
emphasized by an authoritative the Russian media including RT. Western sanctions
might push Russia to deepen cooperation with BRICS states, in particular, to
strengthen its ties with China, which will possibly turn out to be a big
catastrophe for the US and the EU some time later. On March 18,
the spokesperson for the Kremlin, Dmitry Peskov, stated that Russia would switch
to new partners in case of economic sanctions being imposed by the European
Union and the United States. He highlighted that the modern world isn’t unipolar
and Russia has strong ties with other states as well, though Russia wants to
remain in good relations with its Western partners, especially with the EU due
to the volume of trade and joint projects. Those “new partners” are not really
new since Russia has been closely interconnected with them for almost 13 years.
This is all about the so-called BRICS organization, consisting of Brazil,
Russia, India, China and South Africa. BRICS represents 42 percent of the
world’s population and about a quarter of the world’s economy, which means that
this bloc of states is an important global actor. The BRICS
countries are like-minded in regard to supporting the principles of
international law, the central role of the UN Security Council and the
principles of the non-use of force in international relations; this is why they
are so actively performing in the sphere of settling regional conflicts.
However, the cooperation between Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa
goes beyond political aspects and is also demonstrated by dynamic trade and
multiple projects in different areas. Today, in total, there are more than
20 formats of cooperation within the BRICS which are being developing. For
example, in February the member-states came to an agreement about 11 possible
projects of scientific and technical cooperation, from aeronautics to bio-and
nanotechnology. In order
to modernize the global economic system, at the center of which stand the US
and the EU, the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa have
created the BRICS Stock Alliance and are creating their own development bank to
finance large infrastructure projects. On the whole, despite fierce criticism of
BRICS as an organization with no future, it is developing and increasing
cooperation with its members and, in fact, BRICS is showing pretty good results.
With the suspension of Russia’s participation in G8, the West seeks to hit
Russia hard, but it is important to notice that Russia is ready to switch to
other markets, including BRICS, with a view to expanding its trade. WEEK OF MARCH 16 THROUGH MARCH 22 Abbas Repeats The Usual ‘3 No’s’ to
Obama on Core Peace Issues, March 22….(Times of Israel) In his
trip to Washington last week, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas
rejected US Secretary of State John Kerry’s framework document for continued
peace talks with Israel, and issued “three no’s” on core issues, leaving the
negotiations heading for an explosive collapse, an Israeli TV report said
Friday. Specifically, the report said, Abbas rejected Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu’s demand that he recognize Israel as a Jewish state. He also refused
to abandon the Palestinian demand for a “right of return” for millions of
Palestinians and their descendants, a demand that, if implemented, would
drastically alter Israel’s demographic balance and which no conceivable Israeli
government would accept. And finally, he refused to commit to an “end of
conflict,” under which a peace deal would represent the termination of any
further Palestinian demands of Israel. Abbas returned on Thursday from the US,
having held talks with Obama on Monday, and was met at his Ramallah compound by
hundreds of cheering supporters. “We carried the deposit, and we are guarding
the deposit,” Abbas told those supporters somewhat cryptically. “You know all
the conditions and circumstances, and I say to you that capitulating is not a
possibility.” Abbas did not specify what he meant by the “deposit.” During
Monday’s meeting in Washington, Obama told Abbas that he would have to make
tough political decisions and take “risks” for peace, as would Netanyahu. Abbas,
for his part, reiterated his rejection of Israel’s demand that its status as a
Jewish state be enshrined in a future peace accord, asserting that previous
Palestinian recognition of Israel was sufficient. “Everyone understands the
outlines of what a peace deal would look like,” Obama said, describing an
agreement that reflected the pre-1967 lines with agreed land swaps. Sitting next
to the president, Abbas spoke through a translator, thanking Obama for the
opportunity to come to the White House and for the “economic and political
support the US is extending to the Palestinian state so it can stand on its own
feet.” He outlined the Palestinian positions for negotiations, including
“working for a solution that is based on international legitimacy and also the
borders, the 1967 borders, so that the Palestinians can have their own
independent state with East Jerusalem as its capital and so that we can find a
fair and lasting solution to the refugee problem.” The
Palestinian Foreign Ministry notified Abbas that it is prepared to apply for
full membership in international institutions if Israel fails to complete the
fourth and final release of Palestinian prisoners jailed before the signing of
the Oslo Accords, scheduled for March 29. Israel agreed to release 104 such
prisoners in four stages over the nine-month negotiating period, in return for a
Palestinian commitment not to apply for membership in international bodies. March 22….(WND)
There always have been a few voices raising concerns over wildly lavish travel
expenses for the Barack Obama, and sometimes his family, while they are not in
residence in the people’s house in Washington. The vacation by Michelle Obama,
her mother and her daughters to China, going on right now, has sparked the
latest round of questions. The Washington watchdog Judicial Watch, for example,
has watched the dollars fly out since 2009. And WND reported only months ago on
estimates that the family’s African vacation tab was no less than $60 million,
and possibly as high as $100 million. For what mostly was a vacation. There have
been reports that the Obamas spent more than $7 million for Just travel for JUST
three trips in late 2012 and early 2013, including more than $4 million to go to
a Hawaiian vacation at Christmas, more than $2.1 million for a trip to
California and back for Barack Obama to “dine with high-dollar fundraiser
Jeffrey Katzenberg and appear on the ‘Tonight Show’ with Jay Leno” and nearly
another $1.2 million for an “Obama family August vacation” to Martha’s
Vineyard.” Just this
week there’s a report that Michelle Obama, her girls and her mom have been
staying in a suite costing $8,350 per night in China, where a “well-placed hotel
staffer” told the MailOnline that the staff is “fed up.” The dollar
figures that are available have been compiled by Judicial Watch, including
$98,135.79 for Obama’s President’s Day 2013 golf trip, $81,523.64 for Michelle
Obama’s President’s Day 2013 ski trip, $1,092,844.01 for Michelle Obama’s Africa
trip, $115,500.87 for Malia Obama’s spring break in Mexico, $83,182.99 for
Michelle Obama’s President’s Day 2012 ski trip, $467,585 for Michelle Obama’s
trip to Spain, $467,175 for the Obamas’ Copenhagen Olympic bid, and $11,648.17
for the Obama’s to go to New York City for a date night. The 2012-2013
Christmas vacation cost taxpayers, for travel alone, nearly $4.1 million. Those
expenses for Obama’s trip to be on the Leno show, $2.1 million, and the Martha’s
Vineyard trip, $1.1 million. “The Obamas are abusing the public trust and the
taxpayers with unnecessary luxurious vacations and travel,” Judicial Watch
President Tom Fitton has said. “These staggering costs show why these documents
were covered up and we had to sue in federal court to get them. Another
transparency fail for the Obama gang.” The lavish
travel hasn’t always been only by the Obamas. WND reported numerous times on
then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s commuting in an Air Force jet to her
California home. At one point it was documented that she cost taxpayers $101,000
for in-flight food and alcohol over a period in 2008 and 2009. At one point she
instructed the Air Force to provide chocolate-covered strawberries for a snack,
since it was her birthday. And The Daily
Mail in the United Kingdom has highlighted the $10 million in public money
Michelle Obama has spent on her “vacations.” That report said the family
vacation in Hawaii over Christmas 2011 cost taxpayers millions of dollars. Among
some of the categories that made up the estimated more than $4.1 million for the
family vacation were: $3.2 million in flight time to carry the Obamas back and
forth, a Marine contingent for security at $258,000, $21,600 for each of seven
houses rented for 18 days for security officers to be housed, another hotel bill
for $72,000, overtime for local police of $250,000 and others. Sasha and Malia
Obama even have been listed as “Senior Staff” when they travel at taxpayer
expense. That happened on the family’s African safari. ('Glimpse of
Things to Come?) March 22….(The
Christian Post) Anne Graham Lotz, daughter of Christian evangelist Billy
Graham, recently drew a connection between the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight
MH370 and the Rapture, as described in Thessalonians 4:16-17. Lotz, founder of
AnGeL Ministries, made the connection on her personal blog just after the plane
went missing. Lotz suggested that the feeling of unknowingness and helplessness
that has affected the world since the flight disappeared on March 8 will be the
same feeling experienced by mankind when the Rapture happens and God comes back
to Earth to claim His followers for heaven. Nonbelievers will be left to wonder:
"Where have all the people gone?" "I can't help but wonder. Is this worldwide
sense of shock and helplessness, of questions and confusion, of fear and grief,
a glimpse of things to come? Is this a small snapshot of what the entire world
will experience the day after the rapture of the church?" Lotz posed. "Because
the Bible is clear. There is coming a moment in time when Jesus will come back
to gather to Himself all those-dead and alive, who have put their trust in Him.
And on that day, the world will be asking, Where have all the people gone? Not
just 239 of us, but millions of us."
Russia Warns the West it May Side with Iran on Nukes (In clearest threat to US, Russia warns
it will take advantage of nuclear talks with Iran to 'raise stakes' in response
to actions taken by US and EU in wake of Crimea annexation) March 21….(YNET)
Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was quoted Wednesday as saying by the
Interfax news agency that Russia didn't want to use the Iranian nuclear talks to
"raise stakes," but may have to do so in response to the actions by the United
States and the European Union. The statement is the most serious threat of
retaliation by Moscow after the US and the EU announced sanctions against Russia
over the Ukrainian crisis. World powers have not seen any impact so far from
tension with Russia over the Ukrainian region of Crimea on nuclear talks with
Iran, a spokesman for the European Union's foreign policy chief said on Tuesday.
The powers - the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany -
adjourned a new round of nuclear talks described as "substantive and useful"
Wednesday, only two day after Washington and the EU imposed sanctions on Russian
officials. Talks are set to resume April 7 in Vienna. The two sides
spoke at the end of two days of negotiations focused on curbing Tehran's atomic
activities in exchange for full sanctions relief. Their joint statement was read
by EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who speaks for the six countries
negotiating with Iran, and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif. "I
haven't seen any negative effect," spokesman Michael Mann told reporters on
Tuesday while talks were still in full swing. "We continue our work in a unified
fashion". The talks
ended in deadlock with the two sides at odds over Iran's Arak nuclear reactor,
which Western powers fear could yield weapons-grade plutonium. "It's a gap (on
enrichment) that's going to take some hard work to get to a place where we can
find some agreement," a senior US administration official said after the latest
round of negotiations on Iran's atomic program in Vienna. However, Tehran's
foreign minister voiced optimism that their July 20 deadline for a deal is
within reach. March
21….(Christian Science Monitor) A spate of attacks against Israeli military
targets in the Golan Heights has raised fears that Hezbollah is opening a new
conflict with Israel after a hiatus of nearly eight years. Israel's retaliatory
air strikes on Syrian military targets Tuesday night indicates that it holds the
Syrian regime responsible for the suspected actions of Hezbollah, its military
ally. Hezbollah has sent thousands of its fighters to Syria to help President
Bashar al-Assad and are together presently clawing back a strategic belt of
territory north of Damascus. Given that it is both fighting in Syria and
attempting to contain a backlash in Lebanon, where suicide bombers have targeted
Shiite areas in recent months, Hezbollah has no interest in a serious flare-up
with Israel. And Israel has been clear that it does not want an open conflict
with the Shiite militant group. Therefore, the Golan Heights, seized from Syria
in 1967 and annexed by Israel in 1981, is a conveniently ambiguous area from
which Hezbollah can launch anonymous attacks, leaving Israel uncertain of the
perpetrator. The latest of the unclaimed attacks occurred Tuesday, when a
roadside bomb packed with anti-personnel steel balls exploded beside several
Israeli soldiers just south of Majdal Shams at the security fence marking
Israel’s eastern perimeter in the Golan. Four soldiers were wounded in the
blast, one of them seriously. In response,
Israeli jets attacked several Syrian military bases around Quneitra, eight miles
south, overnight. The Israeli military said the targeted sites included a Syrian
military headquarters, artillery batteries and a training base “which enabled
and aided in the carrying out of [Tuesday’s] terror attacks.” Moshe Yaalon,
Israel’s defense minister, said Israel held the Assad regime responsible for the
attack and warned that “if it continues to collaborate with terrorists striving
to hurt Israel then we will keep on exacting a heavy price from it and make it
regret its actions." The Syrian
military said that one soldier was killed and seven wounded in the Israeli air
strikes and condemned the attack. "Repeating such hostile acts (airstrikes)
would endanger the security and stability of the region and make it open to all
possibilities," a Syrian military statement said. The Israeli
security fence winds through steep hills south of Majdal Shams, allowing
militants to approach without being detected. Israel suspects Hezbollah because
it has years of experience using improvised explosive devices against Israeli
troops in south Lebanon. And, while anti-Assad rebel forces are present in much
of the Golan Heights, this area is controlled by the Syrian Army, a battlefield
ally of Hezbollah. “I can’t tell you for sure, but let’s say I’m going to be
really surprised if it’s going to be somebody else other than Hezbollah,” said
Brig. Gen. Amnon Sofrin, a former director of Israel’s Mossad Intelligence
Directorate, in comments made to a group of reporters in Jerusalem. If Hezbollah were
responsible for yesterday's bombing and other recent attacks against the Israeli
military, it marks a departure from the dormancy of the past eight years.
For 2000 to
2006, after Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon, Hezbollah staged periodic attacks
against Israeli forces in the Shebaa Farms, an Israeli-occupied mountainside
along the border. In July 2006, Lebanese militants fought the Israeli army to a
standstill during a month of fighting in south Lebanon. Since then, the Shiite
group has been careful to avoid overt military action in the Shebaa Farms or
elsewhere along the border. The threat of a more destructive war than 2006 has
served as a deterrence not only to Hezbollah, but also to Israel. However, Feb.
24 may have broken that period of mutual deterrence. That night, Israeli jets
struck a Hezbollah target near the village of Janta on Lebanon’s eastern border
with Syria. The target of the attack, the first by Israel on Lebanese territory
since 2006, reportedly was a consignment of advanced anti-aircraft missiles. In the past
year Israel has staged at least six attacks against Syrian military sites,
reportedly hitting air defense systems as well as long-range rockets and
anti-ship missiles that could have been destined for Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Hezbollah admitted that one of its facilities had been targeted and vowed to
“choose the appropriate time, place and method of response.” Four days later,
two Grad rockets fired from inside Syria landed near an Israeli military outpost
on Mount Hermon. On March 5, Israeli troops spotted and opened fire at three men
attempting to plant a roadside bomb beside the Israeli security fence in the
Golan Heights. The Israeli military said the three men were “affiliated with
Hezbollah” and that the planned bomb ambush was thwarted. The most
significant incident occurred March 13, when two roadside bombs exploded against
an Israeli military patrol deep inside the Shebaa Farms. There were no
casualties in the attack, but it was the first in the Shebaa Farms since the
2006 war and only the second deep penetration roadside bomb ambush in the area
since 2000. Hezbollah has not formally commented on any of the attacks or
attempted ambushes in the Golan Heights and Shebaa Farms. There have been
several incidents of small arms fire and mortar rounds falling on the
Israeli-occupied Golan in the past two years, usually interpreted by the
Israelis as unintentional spillover from clashes between the Syrian Army and
rebel forces. However, there was only one previous roadside bomb attack against
Israeli troops in December near the location of Tuesday’s bombing. Like the more
recent attacks in the Golan, there was no claim of responsibility, but the
December bombing came three days after the assassination of Hassan Laqqis, a top
Hezbollah commander, in Beirut, suggesting that it too was carried out by the
Shiite organization. The
difficulty for Israel is how to retaliate without sparking a fresh conflict with
Hezbollah. “We don’t have any intention of escalating the situation with
Hezbollah and go into another war right now,” says Brig. Gen. Sofrin.
“Therefore, if Israel chooses to react, it’s going to be something very
specific, very limited, accompanied with the right message, ‘Ok, we’ve had
enough in this round’.” The question now is whether Tuesday’s roadside bomb
ambush, if carried out by Hezbollah, is considered by the group sufficient
retaliation for last month’s air strike on Janta or whether more attacks will
follow. Top US General: Look for Missing Jet
in Pakistan ('It's possible the US knows much more
than it's saying') March 20….(WND) Retired Lt. Gen.
Thomas McInerney, the recipient of the Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star,
Air Medal with 17 oak-leaf clusters, Distinguished Service Medal and other
honors, is suggesting searchers looking for the missing Malaysia Airlines Boeing
777 take a look at possible landing spots in Taliban-controlled Pakistan. In an
interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News, McInerney, now a contributor to the
network, said his recommendation was based on information from sources he was
unwilling to disclose on television as well as the analysis of an intelligence
service called LIGNET. McInerney
said the free world needs to be worried until the location of the jet, which
disappeared March 8 on a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, is determined. “My
concern is if this airplane could be used as a bearer of a weapon of mass
destruction or even conventional munitions that could attack a carrier, Israel,
our allies,” he said. “We have to be very alert until we know exactly where this
airplane is.” Investigators believe the airplane changed course shortly after
takeoff and headed West for as long as seven hours. They are looking into the
politics of the pilot, who had a Boeing 777 simulator set up in his own home
from which data recently had been deleted. McInerney
said there are at least three bases in Taliban-controlled areas of western
Pakistan that could handle the jet. His theory is consistent with reports that
the last “ping” heard from the jet’s Rolls Royce engines was about seven hours
after takeoff in Malaysia. LIGNET, the Langley Intelligence Group Network,
provides global intelligence and forecasting by former CIA officers and others.
The LIGNET report McInerney cited noted that the Malaysian government
“reportedly is investigating the possibility that missing Malaysia Airlines
Flight MH370 avoided radar detection and landed in Pakistan near the Afghanistan
border inside Taliban-controlled territory, according to the UK Independent.” The Malaysian
foreign minister told reporters that Malaysia asked several Asian countries for
assistance in its investigation, including Pakistan. “Pakistan dismissed the
idea that a Boeing 777 could land undetected inside the country but promised to
work with the Malaysian government in its search for the missing plane,” the
report said. A LIGNET analyst, however, “received information from a source at
Boeing that the company believes the plane did land in Pakistan.” Israel,
consequently, is mobilizing air defenses and scrutinizing approaching civilian
aircraft, according to the Times of Israel.A Boeing 777, LIGNET noted, requires
a 7,500-foot runway, which are available in Pakistan, “meaning Flight 370 could
conceivably be hidden in a hangar inside the country.” “US surveillance of the
area may be able to shed light on the theory through satellite imagery or
signals intelligence.” The general,
who spent 35 years as a pilot, commander and strategic planner in the US Air
Force and later founded Government Reform Through Technology, said the US Navy
had a reason for halting its search in the Indian Ocean. In addition, the Israel
Defense Forces “must know something” that would prompt them to increase their
defense alert.
March 19….(Reuters) Defying Ukrainian protests
and Western sanctions, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a treaty in
Moscow on Tuesday making Crimea part of Russia again but said he did not plan to
seize any other regions of Ukraine. In a fiercely patriotic address to a joint
session of parliament in the Kremlin, punctuated by standing ovations, cheers
and tears, Putin said Crimea's disputed referendum vote on Sunday, held under
Russian military occupation, had shown the overwhelming will of the people to be
reunited with Russia. As the Russian national anthem played, Putin and
Crimean leaders signed a treaty to make Ukraine's region part of the Russian
Federation, declaring: "In the hearts and minds of people, Crimea has always
been and remains an inseparable part of Russia." Parliament is expected to begin
ratifying the treaty within days. Putin later told a flag-waving rally in Red
Square beneath the walls of the Kremlin, near where Soviet politburo leaders
once took the salute at communist May Day parades, that Crimea has returned to
"home port".
Russian forces took control of the Black Sea
peninsula in late February following the toppling of Moscow-backed Ukrainian
President Viktor Yanukovich by protests provoked by his decision to spurn a
trade deal with the European Union last November and seek closer ties with
Russia. People in Crimea voted overwhelmingly in the weekend referendum to join
Russia.
Putin's speech drew immediate hostile
reaction in Kiev and the West. US Vice President Joe Biden called Moscow's
action a "land grab" and on a visit to Poland stressed Washington's commitment
to defending the security of NATO allies on Russian borders. Polish Prime
Minister Donald Tusk said Russia's move was unacceptable to the international
community, while Britain suspended military cooperation with Russia. "It is
completely unacceptable for Russia to use force to change borders, on the basis
of a sham referendum held at the barrel of a Russian gun," British Prime
Minister David Cameron said, threatening Putin with "more serious consequences".
In his speech, the Russian leader lambasted
Western nations for what he called hypocrisy, saying they had endorsed Kosovo's
right to self-determination and independence from Serbia but now denied Crimeans
the same rights. "You cannot call the same thing black today and white
tomorrow," Putin declared, saying that while he did not seek conflict with the
West, Western partners had "crossed the line" over Ukraine and behaved
"irresponsibly". Ukrainian and Russian troops have avoided violent
confrontations, with Kiev anxious to avoid giving Moscow a reason for
overrunning its bases in Crimea.
Russian President Vladimir Putin accused
the United States on Monday of being guided in its foreign policy not by
international law but by the "rule of the gun." "Our Western partners headed by
the United States prefer not to be guided by international law in their
practical policies, but by the rule of the gun," he told a joint session of
parliament. "They have come to believe in their exceptionalism and their sense
of being the chosen ones. That they can decide the destinies of the world, that
it is only them who can be right."
March 19….(The Christian Post) Three Christian
villages were burned down in an attack Friday night in Nigeria's Kaduna state,
with reports stating that more than 100 people were "hacked and burned to
death," allegedly by Muslim gunmen. "We are still picking bodies out of the
bush, but so far there are more than 100 killed," said Daniel Anyip, vice
chairman of the Kaura local government authority, according to Reuters.
Chenshyi village chief Nuhu Moses revealed
that the entire village was burned down, with gunmen having killed more than 50
people. "The unfortunate attack on our communities has led to killing of more
than 100 Christians," the Rev. Yakubu Gandu Nkut, chairman of the Zankan area
chapter of the Christian Association of Nigeria, told Morning Star News. "The
wife of one of our pastors, Mrs. Jummai Likita Riku, and her three children,
from the ECWA (Evangelical Church Winning All) church, Ugwar Sankwai, were
killed in the attack."
While the attackers have not yet been
officially identified, The Associated Press noted that thousands of people have
lost their lives in recent years in competition for land and water between
Muslim Fulani herdsmen and Christian farmers. One resident of Ugwar Sankwai
village, who managed to escape alongside his wife and 22 children and
grandchildren, but lost his brother, said he saw Fulani gunmen pouring fuel on
his house and setting it on fire. "I thank God no one was killed in my
household. My brother was not so lucky. They burned him and 40 people hiding in
his house alive," said 49-year-old Bulus Mallam.
Human Rights Watch said in December that
over 3,000 people have lost their lives in the central region of Nigeria since
2010, and has criticized the Nigerian government for not doing more to try and
stop the escalating violence. Nigeria, largely divided between Christians and
Muslims, has been locked in intense religious and ethnic strife, with Islamic
terrorist organization Boko Haram waging a war on Christians and the Nigerian
government, bombing and gunning down churches, congregations, schools and
government buildings in its mission to establish Islamic rule.
March 19….(In The Days) In a wide-ranging discussion
reported in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, Israel’s plain-speaking defense
minister Moshe Ya’alon said Monday that Tehran has the upper hand in nuclear
negotiations, and dismissed the idea of Israeli dependence on the United States
to lead an action against Iran’s nuclear program, saying that Israel can only
rely on itself. “We had thought the ones who should lead the campaign against
Iran would be the United States,” said Ya’alon, speaking during an event at Tel
Aviv University. “But at some stage the United States entered into negotiations
with them, and unhappily, when it comes to negotiating at a Persian bazaar, the
Iranians were better.”
If Israel had ever expected the United
States to take out Iran’s nuclear weapons capability, that is not about to
happen, Ya’alon said: “Therefore, on this matter, we have to behave as
though we have nobody to look out for us but ourselves.” Ya’alon issued a sharp
critique of Washington’s attitude toward Iran, suggesting President Barack Obama
would prefer to delay any confrontation until it could be passed on to his
successor. “People know that Iran cheats,” Ya’alon said. “But comfortable
Westerners prefer to put off confrontation, if possible, to next year, or the
next president. But in the end, it will blow up.”
Iran went from being “on its knees” due to
economic pressure, sanctions, diplomatic isolation, fear of an internal eruption
and worry over military threats, to averting all crises through a clever “smile
offensive,” Ya’alon said. “There have been delays in the nuclear program, but
the interim agreement signed between Iran and the superpowers in Geneva is very
convenient for the Iranians,” Ya’alon said. “They’re settling down at the
threshold and can decide when to make the breakthrough to a nuclear bomb.”
Ya’alon’s criticism of Obama’s foreign
policy went beyond Iran. The defense minister alluded several times during his
speech to Washington showing weakness in the world. “The moderate Sunni camp in
the area expected the United States to support it, and to be firm, like Russia’s
support for the Shi’ite axis,” Ya’alon said. “I heard voices of disappointment
in the region. I was in Singapore and heard disappointment about China getting
stronger and the US getting weaker. Look what’s happening in Ukraine, where the
United States is demonstrating weakness, unfortunately.” An image of
“feebleness” and weakness can only damage America’s own national security,
Ya’alon said. “If you sit and wait at home, the terrorism will come again,” he
said. “Even if you hunker down, it will come,” he added. “I hope the United
States comes to its senses. If it doesn’t, it will challenge the world order,
and the United States is the one that will suffer.” Putin Accepts & Recognizes Crimean Independence March 18….(AP) Ignoring the
toughest sanctions against Moscow since the end of the Cold War, Russian
President Vladimir Putin recognized Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula as an
"independent and sovereign country" on Monday, a bold challenge to Washington
that escalates one of Europe's worst security crises in years. The brief decree
posted on the Kremlin's website came just hours after the United States and the
European Union announced asset freezes and other sanctions against Russian and
Ukrainian officials involved in the Crimean crisis. President Barack Obama
warned that more would come if Russia didn't stop interfering in Ukraine, and
Putin's move clearly forces his hand. The West has
struggled to find leverage to force Moscow to back off in the Ukraine turmoil,
of which Crimea is only a part, and analysts saw Monday's sanctions as mostly
ineffectual. Moscow showed
no signs of flinching in the dispute that has roiled Ukraine since Russian
troops took effective control of the strategic Black Sea peninsula last month
and supported the Sunday referendum that overwhelmingly called for annexation by
Russia. Recognizing Crimea as independent would be an interim step in absorbing
the region. Crimea had
been part of Russia since the 18th century, until Soviet leader Nikita
Khrushchev transferred it to Ukraine in 1954 and both Russians and Crimea's
majority ethnic Russian population see annexation as correcting a historic
insult. Russia, like Yanukovych himself, characterizes his ouster as a coup, and
alleges the new authorities are fascist-minded and likely to crack down on
Ukraine's ethnic Russian population. Pro-Russia demonstrations have broken out
in several cities in eastern Ukraine near the Russian border, where the Kremlin
has been massing troops. Fearing that
Russia is prepared to risk violence to make a land-grab, the West has
consistently spoken out against Russia's actions but has run into a wall of
resistance from Moscow. Reacting to Monday's sanctions, Russian Deputy Foreign
Minister Sergei Ryabkov declared that they were "a reflection of a pathological
unwillingness to acknowledge reality and a desire to impose on everyone
one-sided and unbalanced approaches that absolutely ignore reality." "I think
the decree of the president of the United States was written by some joker,"
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, one of the individuals hit by the
sanctions, said on his Twitter account. The White House imposed asset freezes on
seven Russian officials, including Putin's close ally Valentina Matvienko, who
is speaker of the upper house of parliament, and Vladislav Surkov, one of
Putin's top ideological aides. The Treasury Department also targeted Yanukovych,
Crimean leader Sergei Aksyonov and two other top figures. The EU's foreign
ministers slapped travel bans and asset freezes against 21 officials from Russia
and Ukraine. Despite
Obama's vow of tougher measures, stock markets in Russia and Europe rose
sharply, reflecting relief that trade and business ties were spared. "I guess
the market view is that Russia forced their case in Crimea, pushed through the
referendum, and the Western reaction was muted, so that this opens the way for
future Russian intervention in Ukraine," said Tim Ash, an analyst who follows
Ukraine at Standard Bank PLC. In the Crimean capital of Simferopol,
ethnic Russians applauded Sunday's referendum that overwhelmingly called for
secession and for joining Russia. Masked men in body armor blocked access for
most journalists to the parliament session that declared independence, but the
city otherwise appeared to go about its business normally. The Crimean
parliament declared that all Ukrainian state property on the peninsula will be
nationalized and become the property of the Crimean Republic. It gave no further
details. Lawmakers also asked the United Nations and other nations to recognize
it and began work on setting up a central bank with $30 million in support from
Russia. Moscow,
meanwhile, called on Ukraine to become a federal state as a way of resolving the
polarization between Ukraine's western regions, which favor closer ties with the
28-nation EU, and its eastern areas, which have long ties to Russia. Russia's
Foreign Ministry urged Ukraine's parliament to call a constitutional assembly
that could draft a new constitution to make the country federal, handing more
power to its regions. It also said the country should adopt a "neutral political
and military status," a demand reflecting Moscow's concern that Ukraine might
join NATO and establish closer political and economic ties with the EU. Ukrainian
Foreign Minister Andriy Deshchytsya visited NATO headquarters in Brussels to
request technical equipment to deal with the secession of Crimea and the Russian
incursion there. NATO said in a statement that the alliance was determined to
boost its cooperation with Ukraine, including "increased ties with Ukraine's
political and military leadership." March 17….(Times of Israel) A former
security chief for El Al said that the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight
370 points directly to Iran. Isaac Yeffet, who served as head of global security
for Israel’s national carrier in the 1980s and now works as an aviation security
consultant in New Jersey, said investigators were correct in honing in on the
two fake-passport carrying Iranian passengers on the doomed flight, and they
have wasted valuable time by exploring other leads. “What happened to this
aircraft, nobody knows. My guess is based upon the stolen passports, and I
believe Iran was involved,” he said. “They hijacked the aircraft and they
landed it in a place that nobody can see or find it.” In the immediate aftermath of the
aircraft’s disappearance, which occurred last week during a standard night
flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, Malaysian officials and the media were
fixated on the story of two Iranians who had made it onto the plane with stolen
passports. As the days wore on and the investigation uncovered new and confusing
details, with officials admitting that the plane could have traveled for as long
as seven hours without radio contact, and that its potential location could be
anywhere from northern Kyrgyzstan to the southern Indian Ocean, attention has
shifted to the pilots and to far-flung conspiracy theories. This is a misstep,
said Yeffet, and one that would not have happened in Israel. “This would never
have happened on an Israeli plane,” says Yeffet. “An El Al aircraft was hijacked
for the first and last time in 1968. Since then, there has not been a single
flight where security did not check every single name.” However, it would have taken more than
just a pair of Iranians with forged documents, Yeffet said, to pull off such an
astonishing crime. “I can’t believe for a second that if these people planned to
hijack the aircraft, it was just them,” he said. But based upon the
tried-and-true Israeli intelligence strategy of profiling, the pilots, he said,
are unlikely suspects. “We are talking about a captain who is 53 years old, who
has worked for Malaysia Airlines for 30 years, and suddenly he became a
terrorist? He wanted to commit suicide? If he committed suicide, where is the
debris?” Adding that the captain in question,
Zaharie Ahmad Shah, was known to be happily married and comfortably well-off,
Yeffet said the profile simply does not fit. “From the United States to China to
Japan, everybody is searching for this aircraft or piece of it. And there is no
sign. So in my opinion, the aircraft was hijacked. And it was an excellent plan
from the terrorists, to land in a place where they can hide the plane and no one
can find it.” US, Russian, Chinese military
satellites hunt MH370 over Central Asia (Is it now being readied for a
terrorist attack?) March 17….(DEBKA)
The US, Russia and China
Sunday, March 16 contributed their military satellites to the search for the
Malaysian Boeing 777, missing without a trace for nine days with 239 people
aboard. US drones have also been diverted from the Afghanistan war to the hunt,
which is focusing increasingly on the former Soviet republics of Central Asia.
The backgrounds of the pilot and co-pilot and the rest of the crew are under
rigorous investigation for leads. Scrutiny of the passengers, 153 of whom are
Chinese, is slow since not all the foreign governments have come up with answers
to questions about their nationals. The multinational investigation is looking
closely at a number of conjectures: 1. The contents of the plane’s cargo: Did
it contain some illicit freight that would have given one or more hijackers a
motive to seize control of the plane, force it to land at a remote spot and
vanish with their prize? That scenario would leave the fate of the passengers
and crew up in the air. They may still be alive and marooned in some wild corner
of the world. 2. Many parts of the Silk Road nations of
Kirgizstan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are broad desert
wastelands. They all have abandoned derelict military and air bases left over
from the defunct Soviet empire. Military satellites and drones manned by experts
have the best chance of pinpointing MH370 in this sort of country. It is now
believed that the last contact with MH370 was beamed from the ground, meaning
that the plane had not spent hours aloft but somewhere on land, which is why the
Malaysian transport minister disclosed Sunday that the search now covered “areas
of land in 11 countries.” 3. The cockpit is being painstakingly
searched for clues. One theory is that the hijackers lurked in the plane before
the passengers boarded after they were smuggled in through the cargo hold. They
may have belonged to the East Turkestan Liberation Organization-ETLO, the Uyghur
separatist movement of the northwest Chinese province of Xinjiang. This
conjecture opens up more complex potentials, such as the possible refueling of
the airliner for use by the hijackers as an instrument of deadly massacre,
echoing the 9/11 atrocities perpetrated by al Qaeda against New York and
Washington. Speculation on those lines has brought the US, Russia and China into
the heart of the search and the investigation. 4. Another possibility under consideration
is a sudden cyber attack on the plane. These methods are advanced enough these
days to control, navigate and bring a large aircraft 75 meters long with a
61-meter wing span like the Boeing 777 down to earth almost intact at a preset
location. Iran, apparently with Chinese expert
assistance, managed to bring down the RQ-170 Sentinel, America’s most secret UAV,
by this method. The Israeli army downed an Iranian drone launched from Lebanon
by an Iranian Revolutionary Guards cyber team in October, 2012. Loth to expose
its advanced cyber capabilities, Israel held to the story that the Iranian drone
was shot down by its fighter jets. If the Malaysian airliner was indeed
commandeered by this means, the attackers may not have intended to go all the
way and were forced to think fast and decide how to end the episode without
leaving incriminating leads behind them. Dumping the plane in a remote place
would answer this need. 5. US intelligence and security
investigators were focusing Sunday on the two pilots, Zaharie Ahmad Shah, 53,
who has logged 18,000 flying hrs. on similar aircraft, and co-pilot Fariq Abdul
Hamid, 27, for answers to the key conundrums of the mystery. Both their homes in
Kuala Lumpur have been searched. The flight simulator found in the captain’s
home is being carefully checked for telltale flight routes. Any possibly links
in the backgrounds of the pilots to potential hijackers or terrorists would help
solve the mystery of the vanished Malaysian airliner and provide a lead to its
fate. Obama Administration Secretly
Working to Unseat Netanyahu FOJ Note:
The Obama Administration’s secret activities amount to an effort to sabotage an
American ally, while effecting an agreement that would render that ally
defenseless. Furthermore, the current Kerry proposal (as revealed in this
article) seeks to coerce a peace settlement on Israel that would serve as a
basis for a permanent solution about 42 months later. Does that 42 months
ring a bell with prophecy scholars? (first half of Tribulation) March 17….(WND)
In recent weeks,
representatives for the Obama Administration have held meetings with a senior
Israeli politician in which the US delegates brought up the possibility of
replacing Benjamin Netanyahu as prime minister, according to an informed
Jerusalem diplomatic source. The meetings were held with Israel’s
popular finance minister, Yair Lapid, founder and leader of the Yesh Atid Party,
which became the second-largest party in the Knesset winning 19 seats in the
last election. The diplomatic source said the Obama administration identified
Lapid as a moderate who could be helpful in pushing the Israeli government into
accepting the framework to create a future Palestinian state. According to
the source, the talks included the possibility of Lapid bolting Netanyahu’s
government if the prime minister rejects the US-brokered regional talks. Lapid,
however, is unlikely to abandon his government post over talks the Palestinians
themselves have been less than enthusiastic about. If Lapid and his 19 Knesset seats did
abandon Netanyahu’s government, the move could put the prime minister’s
coalition in crisis, especially if other parties were to follow suit. Netanyahu
must maintain a plurality of the Knesset’s 120 Knesset seats in his governing
coalition or he would have to face early elections. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority
has received a pledge from the US that by the end of 2014, the Obama
Administration will issue an official written declaration presenting general
highlights of a future Palestinian state, according to a senior Palestinian
negotiator. The negotiator further said the goal is to have the general
framework for a deal ironed out by April. As part of the written declaration,
the US is set to officially recognize Palestinian rights in eastern sections of
Jerusalem, without defining the exact territories that would be eventually
handed to the PA. The US will declare on paper that the Jordan Valley territory
is “occupied” by Israel and that Palestinians have rights there, the negotiator
said. Secretary Kerry is asking for the
international community to administer Jerusalem’s holy sites in the eastern
section of the city, while details are still being discussed about whether
Palestinians will have some symbolic presence in the area. WND in December was
first to report Kerry’s plan calling for an international administrative mandate
to control holy sites in eastern Jerusalem. The exact composition of the
international mandate is up for discussion, but Kerry’s plan recommended a
coalition that includes the Vatican and a group of Muslim countries such as
Turkey and Saudi Arabia. The international arrangement is being proposed as a
temporary solution for about two to three years while security arrangements
in Jerusalem between Israelis and Palestinians are finalized, said Israeli and
Palestinian diplomatic sources. Crimeans Vote to Quit Ukraine for
Russia March 17….(Reuters)
Russian state media
said Crimeans voted overwhelmingly to break with Ukraine and join Russia on
Sunday, as Kiev accused Moscow of pouring forces into the peninsula and warned
separatist leaders "the ground will burn under their feet". With over half the
votes counted, 95.5 percent had chosen the option of annexation by Moscow, the
head of the referendum commission, Mikhail Malyshev, said two hours after polls
closed. Turnout was 83 percent, he added, a high figure given that many who
opposed the move had said they would boycott the vote. Western powers and
leaders in Kiev denounced it as a sham. US Secretary of State John Kerry
told Moscow that Washington would not accept the outcome of the vote in the
region, which has an ethnic Russian majority and was transferred to Ukraine by
Soviet rulers only 60 years ago. The White House also warned Moscow to expect
sanctions while foreign ministers from the European Union, which has major trade
ties with Russia, will decide on possible similar action in Brussels on Monday. In Kiev, Prime Minister Arseny
Yatseniuk threatened dire consequences for the Crimean politicians who had
called the vote, saying separatist "ringleaders" wanted to destroy Ukrainian
independence "under the cover of Russian troops". "We will find all of them, if
it takes one year, two years. and bring them to justice and try them in
Ukrainian and international courts. The ground will burn under their feet," he
told a cabinet meeting. Yatseniuk had just returned from a US trip where he won
expressions of moral support but no offers of weapons. Kiev's pro-European
rulers, who took power after last month's fall of Moscow-backed President Viktor
Yanukovich to popular unrest, have been as powerless as Western governments to
prevent the referendum or buildup of Russian forces on Ukrainian territory. Malaysian PM: Plane Flew 6-7 Hours
After Last Trace March 15….(AP) The Malaysian
jetliner missing for more than a week was deliberately diverted and continued
flying for more than six hours after severing contact with the ground, meaning it
could have gone as far northwest as Kazakhstan or into the Indian Ocean's
southern reaches, Malaysia's leader said Saturday. Prime
Minister Najib Razak's statement confirmed days of mounting speculation that the
disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 to Beijing was not accidental. It
also refocused the investigation into the flight's 12-person crew and 227
passengers, and underlined the complicated task for searchers who already have
been scouring vast areas of ocean. "Clearly the search for MH370 has entered a
new phase," Najib said at a televised news conference. Najib
stressed that investigators were looking into all possibilities as to why the
Boeing 777 deviated so drastically from its original flight path, saying
authorities could not confirm whether it was a hijacking. Earlier Saturday, a
Malaysian official said the plane had been hijacked, though he added that no
motive had been established and no demands had been made known. "In view of this
latest development, the Malaysian authorities have refocused their investigation
into the crew and passengers on board," Najib told reporters, reading from a
written statement but not taking any questions. Police on
Saturday went to the Kuala Lumpur homes of both the pilot and co-pilot of the
missing plane, according to a guard and several local reporters. Authorities
have said they will investigate the pilots as part of their probe, but have
released no information about how they are progressing. Experts have previously
said that whoever disabled the plane's communication systems and then flew
the jet must have had a high degree of technical knowledge and flying experience.
The plane
departed for an overnight flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing at 12:40 a.m. on
March 8. Its communications with civilian air controllers were severed at about
1:20 a.m., and the jet went missing, heralding one of the most puzzling
mysteries in modern aviation history. China, where
the bulk of the passengers were from, expressed irritation over what it
described as Malaysia's foot-dragging in releasing information about the search.
Investigators now have a high degree of certainty that one of the plane's
communications systems, the Aircraft and Communications Addressing and Reporting
System, was disabled before the aircraft reached the east coast of Malaysia,
Najib said. Shortly afterward, someone on board switched off the aircraft's
transponder, which communicates with civilian air traffic controllers. Najib
confirmed that Malaysian air force defense radar picked up traces of the plane
turning back westward, crossing over Peninsular Malaysia into the northern
stretches of the Strait of Malacca. Authorities previously had said this radar
data could not be verified. "These movements are consistent with deliberate
action by someone on the plane," Najib said. Although the aircraft was flying
virtually blind to air traffic controllers at this point, onboard equipment
continued to send "pings" to satellites. The prime
minister said the last confirmed signal between the plane and a satellite came
at 8:11 am, 7 hours and 31 minutes after takeoff. This was more than five hours
later than the previous time given by Malaysian authorities as the possible last
contact. Airline officials have said the plane had enough fuel to fly for up to
about eight hours. "The investigations team is making further calculations which
will indicate how far the aircraft may have flown after this last point of
contact," Najib said. He said authorities had determined that the plane's last
communication with a satellite was in one of two possible arcs, or "corridors,"
a northern one from northern Thailand through to the border of the Central Asian
countries Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, and a southern one from Indonesia to the
southern Indian Ocean. The northern
route might theoretically have taken the plane through China, India, Pakistan,
Afghanistan, which hosts US military bases, and Central Asia, and it is unclear
how it might have gone undetected. The region is also home to extremist
Islamist groups, unstable governments and remote, sparsely populated areas.
Flying south would have put the plane over the Indian Ocean, with an average
depth of 3,890 meters (12,762 feet) and thousands of kilometers (miles) from the
nearest land mass. Najib said search efforts in the South China Sea, where the
plane first lost contact, had ended. Two-thirds of
the plane's passengers were Chinese, and China's government has been under
pressure to give relatives firm news of the aircraft's fate. In a stinging
commentary on Saturday, the Chinese government's Xinhua News Agency said the
Malaysian information was "painfully belated," resulting in wasted efforts and
straining the nerves of relatives. "Given today's technology, the delay smacks
of either dereliction of duty or reluctance to share information in a full and
timely manner," Xinhua said. "That would be intolerable." March
14….(Washington Examiner) Secretary of State John Kerry warned of serious
repercussions for Russia on Monday if last-ditch talks over the weekend to
resolve the crisis in Ukraine failed to persuade Moscow to soften its stance.
Kerry will travel to London for a Friday meeting with Russian Foreign Minister
Sergey Lavrov ahead of a Sunday referendum vote in the Crimea region to secede
from Ukraine and join the Russian Federation. US and
European officials argue that Moscow is orchestrating the referendum and waging
an intimidation campaign with thousands of Russian troops controlling the
region. If Russian-backed lawmakers in Crimea go through with the Sunday
referendum, Kerry said the US and its European allies will not recognize it as
legitimate under international law. The US and
Europe on Monday would then unite to impose sanctions on Russia, Kerry told a
Senate Appropriations subcommittee Thursday during a hearing on the State
Department's budget. “There will be a response of some kind to the referendum
itself,” Kerry said. “If there is no sign from Russia of any capacity to respond
to this issue ... there will be a very serious series of steps on Monday.” “Our
hope is to have Russia join in respecting international law. There is no
justification, no legality to this referendum that is taking place,” he said. March 14….(New
York Times) With a referendum on secession looming in Crimea, Russia massed
troops and armored vehicles in at least three regions along Ukraine’s eastern
border on Thursday, alarming the interim Ukraine government about a possible
invasion and significantly escalating tensions in the crisis between the Kremlin
and the West. The announcement of the troop buildup by Russia’s Defense Ministry
was met with an unusually sharp rebuke from Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany,
who warned that the Russian government must abandon what she called the politics
of the 19th and 20th centuries or face diplomatic and economic retaliation from
a united Europe. “Ladies and gentlemen, if Russia continues on its course of the
past weeks, it will not only be a catastrophe for Ukraine,” she said in a speech
to the German Parliament. “We, also as neighbors of Russia, would not only see
it as a threat. And it would not only change the European Union’s relationship
with Russia. Until
Thursday, the Russian military actions had been largely confined to asserting
control over the Crimean peninsula, the largely Russian-populated area in
southern Ukraine that took steps a week ago to secede and join Russia following
the ouster of the pro-Kremlin government in Ukraine last month. A Crimean
referendum, which Ukraine, the United States and the European Union have called
illegal, is set to ratify that decision on Sunday. But the buildup on Ukraine’s
eastern border with Russia signaled possible further moves by the Kremlin to
reassert authority by force over territory, also heavily populated by Russians,
forfeited in the Soviet Union breakup two decades ago. In a further sign of a military
buildup, Russian news agencies said the Defense Ministry had ordered six
Sukhoi-27 fighter jets and three transport planes to Belarus, a Russian ally, to
fend off what the Belarus president, Aleksandr Lukashenko, called a potential
NATO threat. The Belarus deployment came after NATO sent 12 F-16 fighters to
Poland last week. Oleksandr V. Turchynov, Ukraine’s acting president, said in a
statement on his official website that he believed Russian forces massed near
the border were “ready to intervene in Ukraine at anytime,” and that he hoped
diplomatic efforts by Ukraine and sympathetic nations would “stop the
aggression.” FOJ Note:
As the drama over the missing Malaysian plane plays out
over the airwaves in coming months, it may be well to reflect on the fact that
governments often LIE about some of these types of events. (New York City/TWA
Flight800) The striking idea that mysterious Iranian players may have utilized
stolen passports is cause for special alarm, especially in light of the
possibility that the plane may have been hijacked or simply stolen for a future
assault somewhere. In this instance, we will have to watch, and search for
facts, but suspicious things are definitely present in this case. March 14….(YNET)
At the National Security Agency (NSA) headquarters in Fort Meade, the
American intelligence kept extremely classified information about the connection
between Iranian intelligence and al-Qaeda, starting from the 1990s to the eve of
the 9/11 attacks. Within these piles of materials were 75 intelligence documents
defined as "critical" for understanding the connection between Tehran and Osama
bin Laden, including proof that Iran was responsible for planning the
journeys of at least eight of the 10 Saudi terrorists in the months before 9/11. The
commission members didn't know what to do: On the one hand, they discovered a
completely new lead; on the other hand, there was no way that anyone could
process all this material within several days. On the background, the Bush
administration was breathing down their necks. The US Army had been deep inside
Iraq for more than a year, as a response to the terror offensive. If the
commission were to discover that it was the wrong target, Iran was to blame,
rather than Iraq, what would the president tell his voters, the bereaved
families, the coalition countries, the Iraqi people? Oops, sorry, we made a
mistake? In the end they reached a compromise: They squeezed part of the
information into three pages (p. 240-242 of the report), which were
written in extreme haste, raising serious suspicions that Iran was responsible
for planning the journeys of at least eight of the 10 Saudi terrorists in the
months before the terror attacks, and called for a further thorough
investigation by the administration. Such an
investigation was likely never conducted, because the American administration,
as all administrations, was afraid of trapping itself by determining Iran's
involvement in one of the most significant events in the history of the United
States, which would have required an immediate military response against the
ayatollah regime. Later on, the families of the World Trade Center attack's
victims succeeded in presenting the New York court with sufficient evidence,
some of it from Israeli intelligence sources, that Iran had been involved in
helping to form and create al-Qaeda and in providing the abilities which led the
organization to carry out the dreadful attack. The Malaysian
plane's disappearance has been casting a heavy shadow in recent days on the
headlines of Asia's economic newspapers, and not just on them. The economic boom
in this part of the planet is conditioned and depends on air traffic. Some 50
million people pass through Hong Kong's airport, the financial gate to China,
every year, mostly businesspeople. Damaging the freedom or safety of their
passage may lead to serious economic outcomes. What caused this aviation disaster?
Obviously, it's much too early to say. It will take many months, maybe years,
before the circumstances of the incident are figured out, if they ever are.
Nonetheless, the fact that the plane disappeared at once, without sending
distress signals or reporting a malfunction, raises the fear that it was a
terror attack. On Tuesday, Malaysian sources reported that an Iranian
businessman had purchased the plane tickets for the passengers who got on the
flight, which ended in the depth of the ocean, with fake passports. It would be
surprising if it turns out that Iran, especially these days, took the risk and
got directly involved in such an operation. Yet the Iranian regime is not of one
piece, including the state's intelligence and security organizations, and there
is a possibility that a certain militia would see it fit to cooperate with
radical Islamic groups. Iran
maintains relations of affinity-hatred with global jihad groups. On the one
hand, the jihad members are Sunnis (mostly Salafis) with a religious worldview
which rejects the Shia. On the other hand, both sides are demonstrating
pragmatism and cooperating in certain arenas in different circumstances. Like
with the preparations for the 9/11 attacks, the Iranians or an Iranian group may
not necessarily be aware of full plans, but are providing the jihad groups with
general aid, both logistic and financial, which helps them execute their plans. Iran's direct
or indirect involvement in numerous attacks has either not been investigated
like in the 9/11 case or has been investigated, but the countries holding the
evidence for this involvement, including the US, are avoiding presenting it.
Those in favor of continuing this policy in Tehran can go on uninterrupted. March 14….(YNET) US investigators
suspect that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 stayed in the air for about four hours
past the time it reached its last confirmed location, the Wall Street Journal
reported, citing two people familiar with the details. The report comes as
authorities remain uncertain about which ocean to search for the jetliner that
went missing on Saturday after taking off from Kuala Lumpur. The latest
disclosure led US investigators to explore the possibility that someone
deliberately turned off the transponder and diverted the plane to another
location, the newspaper reported. It raises the possibility that the plane,
and the 239 people on board, could have flown on for additional distance of
about 2,200 miles (3,500 km), potentially reaching the border of Pakistan or as
far as destinations in the Indian Ocean or Arabian Sea, the paper said. The last
definitive sighting of the aircraft on civilian radar screens came shortly
before 1:30 am on Saturday, less than an hour after taking off from Kuala
Lumpur, as it flew northeast across the mouth of the Gulf of Thailand bound for
Beijing. Aviation
investigators and national security officials believe the plane flew for a total
of five hours based on data automatically downloaded and sent to the ground from
the Boeing Co 777's engines as part of a standard monitoring program, the
Journal said. One person told the paper that, as part of a maintenance
agreement, the Malaysia Airlines plane was able to transmit engine data live to
Rolls-Royce for analysis. The system sends data from the Boeing 777's two Trent
800 engines, giving details such as altitude and speed of the jet. US
counter-terrorism officials are pursuing the possibility that a pilot or someone
else on board the plane may have diverted it toward an undisclosed location
after intentionally turning off the jetliner's transponders to avoid radar
detection, the newspaper reported, citing one person tracking the probe.
A senior
Malaysia Airlines executive said on Wednesday that the airline has "no reason to
believe" that any actions by the crew caused the disappearance of a jetliner. At
one briefing, US officials were told investigators are actively pursuing the
notion that the plane was diverted "with the intention of using it later for
another purpose," the Journal said. March 14….(Arutz)
US Secretary of State John Kerry thinks it is a “mistake” for Israel to
demand that the Palestinian Authority (PA) recognize it as a Jewish state in
order to achieve peace. “I think it's a mistake for some people to be raising it
again and again as the decider of their attitude towards the possibility of a
state and peace, and we've obviously made that clear," Kerry told the House
Committee on Foreign Affairs on Thursday, when asked to clarify the official
position of the Obama administration on the issue, according to the Breitbart
website. He further said that the issue was resolved in 1947, when UN Resolution
181, which divided Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state, was passed.
This resolution, said Kerry, referred to "Jewish State" several times. Kerry
also said that former PA Chairman Yasser Arafat explicitly recognized Israel's
right to exist as a Jewish state. Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has insisted that the PA recognize Israel as a
Jewish state in order to reach a peace agreement, explaining that the Arabs’
refusal to recognize Israel stands at the heart of the conflict. PA Chairman
Mahmoud Abbas has repeatedly insisted that the PA would not recognize Israel as
a Jewish state and has also stressed that the future Palestinian state would not
include the presence of a single Israeli, civilian or soldier. He stood his
ground last Friday, saying during a meeting with Fatah youth activists that that
there is "no way" he will recognize Israel as a Jewish state and accept a
Palestinian capital in just a portion of eastern Jerusalem. On Sunday, he was
backed by members of his Fatah party, who unanimously endorsed his rejection of
demands to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. On Saturday, Kerry’s spokeswoman
Jen Psaki said that the United States believes there is no need for the PA to
recognize Israel as a Jewish state as part of a peace agreement. March 14….(Arutz)
A senior Palestinian Authority (PA) official appeared on PA TV on Wednesday,
where he called Israelis "an advanced instrument of evil," claiming "Allah
will gather them so that we can kill them." The official, Abbas Zaki,
further opined Israelis "have no belief, no principles." He is a close associate
of PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas; last October he reportedly went to Syria as
Abbas's personal representative, and he has spoken at public events representing
Abbas's Fatah movement. The PA TV host speaking with Zaki claimed Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu had "failed in his attempt to stir up the media," referencing
his exposure of the seized Iranian shipment of arms to Gaza on Monday. According to
the host's theory, Netanyahu's "disappointment" in low world concern over the
transfer of weapons to the terror group Hamas caused him to turn "to the option
of bloodshed," a reference to the Tuesday IAF strike on Islamic Jihad terrorists
in Gaza after they fired mortars at IDF soldiers. Zaki responded by saying
Netanyahu "provoked an uproar," blaming Israel for the barrage of nearly 100
rockets fired from Gaza starting Wednesday and into Thursday. "Don't tell
anyone, we want to destroy Israel" This is not
the first bombshell comment made by Zaki. In February he said on TV "none of us,
especially in Fatah, has ruled out the military options" against Israel. Back in
January, the Fatah man revealed on Syrian TV that any agreement Abbas reaches
with Israel will merely be the "first stage" in destroying Israel. Zaki
similarly revealed the not-so-secret intentions of the PA back in 2011, when he
said "if Israel withdraws from Jerusalem, evacuates the 650,000 settlers, and
dismantles the wall, what will become of Israel? It will come to an end." “If we
say that we want to wipe Israel out, come on, it's too difficult. It's not
acceptable policy to say so. Don't say these things to the world,” he warned.
“Keep it to yourself.” Gaza Islamic Jihad (Iranian Proxy)
Launches Attacks on South Israel March 13….(DEBKA) The pro-Iranian
Palestinian Jihad Islami terror group rained Wednesday, March 12 a heavy,
continuous missile barrage against Israel, just two days after the Israeli
presentation in Eilat of the illicit cargo of Iranian arms destined for
terrorists aboard the Klos C, which Israeli commandos captured on the Red Sea
last week. The presentation included 60 M302 short-range missiles made in Syria
and flown to Iran for shipment to Gaza and Sinai via Sudan. The Jihad Islamic took advantage of
the heavy cloud and rain over the region, conditions which impede Israeli air
force action, to release a heavy barrage of Qassam and Grade rockets against
Israeli towns and villages. By nightfall, at least 50 rockets had been fired at
the towns of Sderot and Netivot and the regions of Shear Hanegev, Eshkol and
Bnei Shimon. Iron Dome
missile interceptors were activated against the barrage. No casualties or damage
have been so far reported. Red alert signals sent hundreds of thousands of
citizens running for shelter. Debkafile’s
military sources note that the Palestinian Jihad Islami operates under the
direct command of the Iranian Al Qods Brigades commander Gen. Qassem Soleimani,
who was given charge by Tehran last month of Middle East areas of conflict in
which Iran has an interest, including the Palestinian-Israeli sector. His modus
operandi is known to be never to let an Israeli strike against Iran or any of
its allies go unanswered. The massive
rocket attack from the Gaza Strip is seen his payback for Israel’s interception
of the Iranian missile ship, just as Iran’s Lebanese proxy, Hizballah, may be
expected to hit back for Israel’s aerial bombardment of its missiles on the
Syrian-Lebanese border and more attacks to come from Gaza. March 13….(The
Guardian) After months of battlefield stalemate in Syria, a flurry of
reports from Washington, Jerusalem, Amman and the Gulf suggests a major new
clandestine effort is under way to open up a "southern front" against the regime
of Bashar al-Assad. Central to the mooted plan is a renewed push to provide
Syria's badly divided and often ineffectual moderate, secular rebel groups with
additional funding, upgraded weapons and intelligence support. What use they may
make of such support, if indeed it fully materializes, remains to be seen. The
initiative, as reported in the region, is set against a backdrop of secret talks
in the US last month between Susan Rice, Barack Obama's national security
adviser, and Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, the Saudi interior minister in charge of
covert action programs in Syria. According to
the usually well informed Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, spy chiefs
from Jordan, Turkey, Qatar and other regional countries also attended the
discussions, focused on making a "stronger effort" to help the rebels. This
meeting has been linked in turn to last month's launching by the Free Syrian
Army (FSA) of what they termed a spring offensive in the south of Syria. The
offensive began days after they received new US weapons funding that may
eventually total $31.4m (£18.9m), rebel commanders said. After holding back for
months owing to fears that new arms might fall into the hands of al-Qaida
affiliates, unidentified American officials said Congress had given closed-door
approval in January for renewed cash for light weapons intended for the
moderate, secular opposition in the south. The new US funding supposedly
augments a fresh push by Gulf states to finance rebel operations in the southern
region of Syria, which are ultimately aimed at Damascus. More than $1billion
has been disbursed since last summer, much of it for weapons purchases in
eastern Europe, according to Gulf government sources quoted by regional media.
According to
various reports mostly based on rebel statements or official or semi-official
leaks, the aim of the offensive is to push back government forces in the Daraa,
Quneitra and As-Suwayda governorates in south-west Syria, so opening the road to
Damascus. The offensive has been dubbed Geneva Horan, a reference to the plains
near the Jordanian border and Israeli frontier. This new emphasis on military
action along the southern front follows well documented concern that the
predominance in northern and eastern Syria of jihadis belonging to the al-Nusra
Front, which is linked to al-Qaida, and rival groups such as the Islamic State
in Iraq and the Levant has become both destructive and counterproductive.
Detailed media reports claim the operational plans, supply routes and tactics
for the new push are being overseen by a secret international operations command
center in Amman staffed by military officials from 14 countries, including the
US, Britain, Israel and Arab states opposed to the Assad regime. Jordan denies
the existence of the center and of reportedly CIA-run rebel training facilities
in northern Jordan. None of the western or Arab states that have intelligence
and military staff working at the center, the Military Operations Command (MOC),
has publicly acknowledged it, but the center's existence has become an open
secret, the National claimed. Whatever the accuracy of such reports, there is
little doubt that Jordan's officially neutral stance over the Syrian war is
threatened by the increasing importance of the southern front as the conflict
enters its fourth year. Despite Amman's denials, it is known to have close links
with western intelligence agencies. It is also widely believed that its
territory is being used by western and Arab backers of the moderate secular
opposition to assist and direct anti-Assad operations. Although
President Obama says the US continues to pursue a diplomatic solution, the
suggestion of increased covert US support for military action in southern Syria
is plausible. There is much anger in Washington at the failure of the Geneva
peace talks to make progress, in part because of Russia, Assad's most powerful
ally. These developments, if confirmed, also indicate a tentative rapprochement
between the US and Saudi Arabia, the Syrian opposition's biggest regional
backer, after a period when the two countries could not agree on tactics. In a
landmark visit, Obama will travel to Riyadh later this month for talks
that will focus on Syria and Iran. In other recent meetings designed to
coordinate policy, Obama discussed the Syrian crisis with Jordan's King Abdullah
and Israel's prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu. Nigeria
Upholds Islamic Law for Killing Converts to Christianity March
13….(Virtue on Line) Muhammad commanded: Whoever changed his Islamic
religion, then kill him" (Bukhari 9.84.57). This is still the position of all
the schools of Islamic jurisprudence, both Sunni and Shi'ite. Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the
most renowned and prominent Muslim cleric in the world, has stated: "The Muslim
jurists are unanimous that apostates must be punished, yet they differ as to
determining the kind of punishment to be inflicted upon them. The majority of
them, including the four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i,
and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite
schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-'ashriyyah, Al-Ja'fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah)
agree that apostates must be executed." There is only disagreement over whether
the law applies only to men, or to women also, some authorities hold that
apostate women should not be killed, but only imprisoned in their houses until
death. Cairo's Al-Azhar
University, the most prestigious and influential institution in the Sunni world,
certifies as a reliable guide to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni
Muslim community a manual of Islamic law that states: "When a person who
has reached puberty and is sane, and voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he
deserves to be killed". Although the right to kill an apostate is
reserved in Islamic law to the leader of the community and other Muslims can
theoretically be punished for taking this duty upon themselves, in practice a
Muslim who kills an apostate needs to pay no indemnity and perform no expiatory
acts (as he must in other kinds of murder cases under classic Islamic law).
This accommodation is made because killing an apostate "is killing someone who
deserves to die" IRGC Commander: Iran’s Finger on
Trigger to Destroy Zionist Regime March 12….(FARS)
Lieutenant Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC)
Brigadier General Hossein Salami underlined that Iranian military commanders are
prepared to attack and destroy the Zionist regime of Israel as soon as they
receive such an order. “Today, we can destroy every spot which is under the
Zionist regime's control with any volume of fire power (that we want) right from
here,” Salami said, addressing a conference in Tehran on Tuesday dubbed ‘the
Islamic World's Role in the Geometry of the World Power’. “Islam has given us
this wish, capacity and power to destroy the Zionist regime so that our hands
will remain on the trigger from 1,400km away for the day when such an incident
(confrontation with Israel) takes place,” he added. Salami
reminded that Iran is not the only country which enjoys such a capability, as
even the artilleries of a number of other (Muslim) countries can also target and
attack the Zionist regime today. In relevant
remarks in November, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed
Ali Khamenei warned Iran’s enemies to avoid even thinking of any aggressive move
against the country, stressing that the Iranian Armed Forces are ready to give
such a crushing response to any threat that aggressors will never forget.
Addressing 50,000 Basij (volunteer force) commanders in Tehran, Ayatollah
Khamenei pointed to the preparedness of Iran’s military forces, and said, “The
response of the Iranian nation to any foreign aggression will be regrettable for
the enemy.” The Supreme
Leader underlined that the increasing threats by the enemy show that the US-led
western sanctions have not been effective and they have understood it
themselves. Addressing the arrogant powers, Ayatollah Khamenei said, “Instead of
threatening other countries, go and deal with your wretched economic conditions
and think of you debts.” The Supreme Leader underlined that the Zionist regime
has been imposed on the region, "Anything that is gained with force will not
last long and this regime will not last either." Also in
December, Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Major General
Mohammad Ali Jafari underlined that Iran will give a crushing response to any
possible aggressor. Major General Jafari deplored the US president’s repeated
rhetoric of “military option against Iran is on the table, as “ludicrous” and
said, “Repetition of such an absurd sentence by the officials of the US and the
fake and evil Zionist regime of Israel sounds funny to the Iranian nation.” The IRGC
commander went on to say that the US or Israeli officials are totally incapable
of taking any military action against Iran, but at the same time affirmed that
any “stupid measure” by the enemies would compel Iran to consider the options it
has on the table. “Lots of options are on the table for Iran, and they (enemies)
will receive crushing responses, one of which would be elimination of the
Zionist regime,” he warned.
March 11….(DEBKAfile Exclusive Report) Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu
warned Monday, March 10, that because the world chooses to slide over Iran’s
concealed nuclear program, the next Klos C ship may not carry missiles but
“nuclear suitcases.” They would not only reach an Israeli port, he said, but any
port in the world. He spoke at Israel’s naval base in Eilat at the presentation
of the 60 missiles, 181 mortar shells and hundreds of bullets unloaded from the
Klos C that was apprehended by Israeli commandos on the Red Sea opposite Sudan
last week. Present too were defense minister Moshe Ya’alan, chief of staff Lt.
Gen. Benny Gantz and top generals. Netanyahu did not elaborate on his reference
to nuclear suitcases. debkafile’s military and intelligence sources link it to a
shipment of 6-10 “nuclear suitcases” that were part of an illegal Ukraine
delivery to Iran in 2003 or 2004 of half a dozen nuclear-capable X-55 cruise
missiles (NATO codenamed AS-15) whose 2000-km range covers every part of
Israel.
These nuclear suitcases were believed at the time by Western and Middle East
intelligence sources to be an original development of Russian nuclear agencies.
In 2005, Ukraine president Viktor Yushchenko confirmed the sale of the X-55
missiles to Iran and China, by his predecessor. But never referred to the
nuclear suitcases; nor were they confirmed by Russia or the US.S.
Nuclear suitcases were designed as a mobile weapon of mass destruction for
the easy transfer of tactical nuclear weapons or dirty bombs from place to
place. It was therefore perfect for terrorists.s. As for the missiles, Israel intelligence estimated that they were sold to
Iran without nuclear warheads but with attached diagrams and specifications, so
providing the technology whichr jumped Iran forward in its quest for a nuclear
weapon. The nuclear suitcases, too, were apparently sold without nuclear
explosives. All this means that Iran secretly possessed nuclear-capable,
long-range missiles almost a decade ago. The illicit Ukrainian transaction,
hinted at by the prime minister, had additional murky and serpentine features.
It is presumed that China which bought the same number of missiles as Iran
footed the bill for both. To disguise the sale, Ukraine and Iran cooked the
sales and shipping documents to show that the end-users of the weapons were
Russian. The forging of documents is clearly a common Iranian trick of
concealment up to the present day. Along with the inventory of weapons unloaded
from the Klos C, Israel displayed Monday fake Iranian shipping manifests
designed to conceal the ship’s route from Bandar Abbas in Iran to Port Sudan en
route for Sinai and the Gaza Strip. The Prime minister implicitly rebuked EU Foreign Police Executive Catherine
Ashton for failing to raise the Iranian weapons ship in her talks in Tehran
Monday, when he said, “There is a shrill chorus of international condemnation
when we build a balcony in Jerusalem, but scarcely a word when Iran tries to
smuggle missiles into Gaza.” IDF officers at the Eilat presentation pointed to
four types of M-302 missiles shipped from Iran with ranges of 90, 120, 140 and
160 km, which could cover the distance from the Gaza Strip to Haifa. Invited to
the presentation were also foreign diplomats and correspondents, although few of
the latter attended (Arab Foreign Ministers meet at the Arab
League building in Cairo…"We reject Israel") March 10….(Times
of Israel) Arab foreign ministers on Sunday rejected Israel’s demands that the
Palestinians recognize it as a Jewish state, saying such a move would undermine
the rights of Palestinian refugees. In a resolution released at the headquarters
of the Arab League in Cairo, the foreign ministers called the issue of
Palestinian refugees an integral part of a comprehensive and just peace. It
blamed Israel for the floundering of peace negotiations. The Arab statement
offers strong backing to Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, who said publicly
last week he will never recognize Israel as a Jewish state despite facing strong
international pressure. Abbas did not identify who is pressuring him. Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last week the Palestinians must recognize
Israel as a Jewish state to show they are serious about peace. It was the latest
sign that despite seven months of mediation efforts by US Secretary of State
John Kerry, wide gaps remain between the two sides. Abbas is due to meet US
President Barack Obama in Washington on March 17, as part of US efforts to press
both sides. He has said that the Palestine Liberation Organization recognized
the state of Israel in 1993 and that this is sufficient. The current
round of talks began in late July, but was plagued from the start by
disagreement between Abbas and Netanyahu on the ground rules. The Palestinians
want a state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem, lands Israel
captured in 1967, and say talks about that state should use the 1967 border as a
starting point. That position is backed by the US but rejected by Netanyahu. The
seven-page Arab resolution on the Palestinian issue said it rejects “the demand
by Israel and some international parties to identify Israel as a Jewish state,
which aims to annul the right of return and compensation for Palestinian
refugees.” It also called for efforts to convene an international conference to
address the Palestinian issue, and a reevaluation of the role of international
mediators known as the Quartet, in light of their “failure to make any
achievement in realizing just and comprehensive peace.” Arab League
chief Nabil Elaraby urged Arab countries during the opening session of the
meeting to take a “firm stand” against the Israeli demand, calling it a
deviation from an agreed-upon framework for peace talks. Elaraby described the
demand as an Israeli attempt to foil the talks, calling for a reevaluation of
the negotiation track. “This is a deviation from the international resolutions
agreed upon as a basis for the Palestinian-Israeli negotiations, which requires
a firm Arab stand to reevaluate the negotiation track as a whole, and to
strongly express definite Arab rejection of this serious turn,” he told the
opening session of the meeting. The issue is to be followed up at an upcoming
Arab leaders’ summit in Kuwait in the final week of March. Following the
meeting, Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad Maliki told reporters that the
resolution boosts Abbas’ position ahead of his visit to Washington, where he is
expected to come under more pressure. “The foreign ministers issued the
resolution “to tell Abbas, go to Washington and speak in all our names,” he
said. March 10….(Israel
Today) The Palestinian Authority’s mission to the United Nations last week filed
an official complaint over a growing Jewish presence on and claims to
Jerusalem’s Temple Mount. Riyad Mansour, the PA’s observer at the UN, said that
regular visits to the Temple Mount by Jewish worshippers and Israeli officials
were “provocative” and could further enrage the entire Muslim Arab world.
Mansour took special exception to the Israeli Knesset’s recent discussions about
fully extending Israeli sovereignty over the Temple Mount, which is Judaism’s
holiest site. The Palestinian official insisted that such action would violate
all international laws and norms, and would destabilize the region. The
Palestinian position has been backed up by the Arab League, which labeled the
recent Knesset debates over the Temple Mount as an “Israeli attack” on what they
see as an exclusively Muslim shrine.
WEEK OF MARCH 2 THROUGH MARCH 8 March
7….(Reuters) President Vladimir Putin rebuffed a warning from US President
Barack Obama over Moscow's military intervention in Crimea, saying on Friday
that Russia could not ignore calls for help from Russian speakers in Ukraine.
After an hour-long telephone call, Putin said in a statement that Moscow and
Washington were still far apart on the situation in the former Soviet republic,
where he said the new authorities had taken "absolutely illegitimate decisions
on the eastern, southeastern and Crimea regions. "Russia cannot ignore calls for
help and it acts accordingly, in full compliance with international law," Putin
said. Ukraine's
border guards said Moscow had poured troops into the southern peninsula where
Russian forces have seized control. Serhiy Astakhov, an aide to the border
guards' commander, said there were now 30,000 Russian soldiers in Crimea,
compared to the 11,000 permanently based with the Russian Black Sea fleet in the
port of Sevastopol before the crisis. Putin denies that the forces with no
national insignia that are surrounding Ukrainian troops in their bases are under
Moscow's command, although their vehicles have Russian military plates. The West
has ridiculed his assertion. The most
serious east-west confrontation since the end of the Cold War, resulting from
the overthrow last month of President Viktor Yanukovich after violent protests
in Kiev, escalated on Thursday when Crimea's parliament, dominated by ethnic
Russians, voted to join Russia. The region's government set a referendum for
March 16, in just nine days' time. European Union leaders and Obama denounced
the referendum as illegitimate, saying it would violate Ukraine's constitution.
The head of Russia's upper house of parliament said after meeting visiting
Crimean lawmakers on Friday that Crimea had a right to self-determination, and
ruled out any risk of war between "the two brotherly nations". Obama
announced the first sanctions against Russia on Thursday since the start of the
crisis, ordering visa bans and asset freezes against so far unidentified people
deemed responsible for threatening Ukraine's sovereignty. Russia warned that it
would retaliate against any sanctions. Japan
endorsed the Western position that the actions of Russia, whose forces have
seized control of the Crimean peninsula, constitute "a threat to international
peace and security", after Obama spoke to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. China, often
a Russian ally in blocking Western moves in the UN Security Council, was more
cautious, saying that economic sanctions were not the best way to solve the
crisis and avoiding comment on the legality of a Crimean referendum on
secession. The EU, Russia's biggest economic partner and energy customer,
adopted a three-stage plan to try to force a negotiated solution but stopped
short of immediate sanctions. Meanwhile,
Russia said Ukraine must pay off almost $2 billion owed for natural gas by today
and signaled supplies may otherwise be cut, ratcheting up the pressure on
its cash-strapped neighbor as the two nations scrap over the future of the Black
Sea Crimea region. Ukraine hasn’t made its February fuel payment and owes Russia
$1.89 billion, according to gas export monopoly OAO Gazprom (OGZD), which halted
supplies to Ukraine five years ago amid a pricing dispute, curbing flows to
Europe. (PA President adamantly refuses to acknowledge Israel's core
request) March 7….(YNET)
The Palestinian president says there's "no way" he'll recognize Israel as a
Jewish state and accept just a portion of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem as the
Palestinian capital. US Secretary of State John Kerry is to present ideas for
the contours of a deal to Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Gaps between the sides remain wide after seven months of Kerry's mediation, and
a framework by an April 29 deadline appears elusive. March 7….(DEBKA)
Amid spiraling tensions between Moscow and the West over the fate of Crimea,
Russia has mobilized its air and coastal defenses and more than 1,000 missile
and tank units for a month-long drill in Kapustin Yar, around 450 km from the
Ukraine border in the Astrakhan district. Debkafile’s military sources report
that this facility is home to one of Russia’s biggest missile bases. The
exercise covers the whole of March and early April, including the March 16
Crimean referendum on secession and its aftermath. It will conclude with
live-firing drills and the deployment of air defense systems in early April,
when Moscow calculates they may be needed to thwart any Ukrainian or Western
attempt to disrupt Crimea’s expected application to join the Russian Federation. The
referendum, put forward by two weeks to March 16, will ask roughly three million
Crimean citizens for a straight “yes” or “no” on whether to remain part of
Ukraine or secede to Russia. Since around 65 percent of the voters are ethnic
Russians, the region’s future is not hard to predict. The Russian parliament
announced voting on a bill enabling annexation of Crimea to the Russian
Federation at the request of a majority would take place on March 21. President
Barack Obama, in an hour-long phone call to President Vladimir Putin early
Friday, March 7, declared the referendum was a violation of international law,
echoing European Union leaders. After imposing sanctions on individuals abetting
Crimea’s breakaway from Ukraine, Obama urged the Russian leader to cancel the
referendum and return his forces to the bases Russia holds on lease in Crimea.
Putin replied that the regime in Kiev and its decisions were “absolutely
illegitimate.” He said he appreciated the importance of the Russian-American
relationship to global security, and maintained that bilateral ties “should not
be sacrificed for individual, albeit rather important, international issues.” Col. Oleg
Kochetkov of the Kapustin Yar district command described the new Russian
deployment as “the largest-ever exercise held by air defense units of the
Western Military District.” He added: “It is for the first time that all air
defense units from the district, including coastal defenses of the Northern
Fleet, have gathered in one place.” Taking part in the exercise are S-300
long-range surface-to-air missiles, Buk-M1 medium-range missiles and Strela-10
short-range missiles. Debkafile’s
military sources report that Kapustin Yar is home to one of Russia’s biggest
missile bases. From there, the army tested on March 3 its new anti-air missile
system S-500, followed the next day by the test-launch of an RT-2PM Topol (NATO
codenamed SS-25 Sickle) IBCM. This flurry of Russian military momentum is partly
in response to the military steps announced by the Pentagon in the last 48
hours: Friday,
March 7, the USS Truxtun guided-missile destroyer crossed the Bosporus into the
Black Sea to join the fleets of NATO allies Rumania and Bulgaria in a naval
exercise, the day after the Pentagon unveiled plans to put another six US F-15
fighters on an air patrol mission over the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and
Lithuania. Twelve US F-16 fighter bombers and 300 military personnel are to be
transferred to Poland over the weekend and more US military exercises are
planned in areas around the Russia starting Sunday. Crimea Votes to Join Russia March 6….(Reuters) Crimea's
parliament voted to join Russia on Thursday and its Moscow-backed government set
a referendum within 10 days on the decision in a dramatic escalation of the
crisis over the Ukrainian Black Sea peninsula. The sudden acceleration of moves
to bring Crimea, which has an ethnic Russian majority and has effectively been
seized by Russian forces, formally under Moscow's rule came as European Union
leaders gathered for an emergency summit to find ways to pressure Russia to back
down. US President
Barack Obama took steps to punish those involved in threatening the sovereignty
and territorial integrity of Ukraine, ordering the freezing of their US assets
and a ban on travel into the United States. The US Navy announced a
guided-missile destroyer, the USS Truxton, was heading to the Black Sea in what
it said was a long-planned training exercise and not a show of force. The Crimean
parliament voted unanimously "to enter into the Russian Federation with the
rights of a subject of the Russian Federation". The vice premier of Crimea, home
to Russia's Black Sea military base in Sevastopol, said a referendum on the
status would take place on March 16. He said all state property would be
"nationalized," the Russian ruble could be adopted and Ukrainian troops would be
treated as occupiers and be forced to surrender or leave. The
announcement, which diplomats said could not have been made without Russian
President Vladimir Putin's approval, raised the stakes in the most serious
east-west confrontation since the end of the Cold War. Russia stocks fell and
the ruble weakened further after the news. Moody's ratings agency said the
stand-off was negative for Russia's sovereign creditworthiness. Russia said it
would make it easier to give passports to native Russian speakers who have lived
in Russia or the former Soviet Union. Putin has cited the threat to Russian
citizens to justify military action in Georgia in 2008 and now in Ukraine. Far
from seeking a diplomatic way out of the crisis, Putin appears to have chosen to
create facts on the ground before the West can agree on more than token action
against him. EU leaders
had been set to warn but not sanction Russia over its military intervention
after Moscow rebuffed Western diplomatic efforts to persuade it to pull forces
in Crimea, with a population of about 2 million, back to their bases. It was not
immediately clear what impact the Crimean moves would have. Israel Intercepts Iranian Weapons
Shipment to Gaza March 6….(Times of Israel) IDF
special forces on Wednesday intercepted a ship in the Red Sea carrying an
Iranian arms shipment headed for the Gaza Strip, Israel’s military said. The
army said soldiers carried out a preliminary inspection of the ship and found
several dozen advanced Syrian M-302 missiles, with a range of up to 200
kilometers (125 miles) and a payload of up to 170 kilograms (375 pounds). The
missiles were hidden in shipping containers also carrying sacks of concrete. The
incident took place 1,500 kilometers (930 miles) from Israel’s coast, in the Red
Sea, off the Sudanese-Eritrean border. Israel had been tailing the ship for
several days before the operation was launched. The ship had a crew of 17, who
were being interrogated by Israeli security forces. Defense Minister Moshe
Ya’alon said crew members were apparently unaware of the ship’s secret cargo. The vessel
had reportedly set sail from Iran 10 days ago and was set to reach Sudan on
Thursday. From there, the weaponry would have been smuggled into Gaza. “As it
conducts talks with [world] powers, as Iran smiles and utters pleasantries, the
same Iran is sending lethal weapons to terror organizations, via an intricate
network of clandestine global operations, in order to hurt innocent civilians,”
he added. Prime Minister Netanyahu said, “This is the real Iran and this country
must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Hamas said
the interception was a “silly joke,” Reuters reported. “This is a new Israeli
lie aimed to justify and prolong the blockade of Gaza,” Taher Al-Nono, an
adviser of Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, told the news agency. Ya’alon
said the intercepted shipment proved Iran was exporting terror “with the express
purpose of destabilizing the Middle East.” “This Iranian attempt to transfer
weapons to the Gaza Strip is additional evidence that Gaza is a terrorist entity
under Iranian auspices preparing to strike deep into Israel,” he added. March 6….(DEBKA)
In an unusually frank disclosure, White House spokesman Jay Carney said
Wednesday night, March 5, that US intelligence services and military had worked
with Israel to track the Iranian Panama-flagged ship KLOS C, which was
apprehended by Israeli naval commandos on the Red Sea earlier that day carrying
missiles for Gaza via Sudan. The ship was boarded by the Israeli elite Shayetet
13 (Flotilla 13) and found to be carrying dozens of 302mm rockets made in Syria
with a range of 150 km made in Syria. It is now on its way to Eilat. The White
House spokesman said that Washington worked with Israeli through intelligence
and military channels, and at the national security adviser level, as soon as it
knew the shipment was on the move. He said that President Barack Obama also
directed the US military to work out contingencies in case it became necessary
to intercept the vessel. “Our Israeli counterparts ultimately chose to take the
lead in interdicting the shipment of illicit arms,” Jay Carney said. Debkafile
reports that this was the first time in four years that the US and Israel have
collaborated in an operation against Iran, ever since the Stuxnet virus
attack in 2010 on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Until now, the Obama administration
steadfastly refused to act against Iran for fear of jeopardizing the
international diplomatic track for curbing its nuclear program. Israel’s
elite Shayetet 13 boarded an Iranian Panama-registered cargo vessel KLOS C.
Concealed in its hold under sacks of cement were dozens of 302mm rockets with a
range of 150 kms, manufactured in Syria and destined by Iran for the Gaza Strip
after being offloaded in Sudan. The Israeli commandos seized the vessel in open
sea on the maritime border of Sudan and Eritrea, 1500 south of Israel, and have
set it on course for Eilat. Sudan has been revealed by Debkafile’s military
sources as having been transformed in the last two years into a major Iranian
weapons manufacturing and logistic depot, which supplies Syria, HIzballah and
Hamas. Port Sudan is also the hub for the smuggling of Iranian arms to
various Middle East locations. The IDF said the
Iranian missile cargo was destined for the Palestinian Hamas which rules the
Gaza Strip. If this is so, it would mean that Iran had gone back to arming Hamas
with missiles and rockets after a two-year pause during which the Palestinian
extremists were cold-shouldered by Tehran for their animosity to Syria’s Bashar
Assad. By the same token, it is hard to believe the Assad would consent to relay
Syrian-made missiles to this antagonist. Some Middle East military sources
believe the shipment as not destined for Palestinian terrorists for use against
Israel, but rather for Muslim Brotherhood activists fighting the Egyptian army
from their forward base in the Gaza Strip. They don’t rule out the possibility
of Al Qaeda affiliates fighting in Sinai as being the address. Western
intelligence has recorded instances of Iran entering into ad hoc operational
collaboration with al Qaeda elements when it suits Tehran's book. The
apprehension operation was carried out under an air umbrella by hundreds of
naval commandos without casualties. It was directly commanded by the IDF Chief
of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz from high command headquarters and the Navy Chief
Maj. Gen Ram Rottberg from a floating command post at sea. The rockets were
flown from Syria to Iran, then loaded on a ship where they were concealed under
sacks of cement inside containers. From the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas, the
ship headed into the Red Sea bound for Sudan where it was intercepted by Israeli
commandos. The Iranian arms ship’s progress was tracked all the way. In
congratulating the IDF forces which seized the shipment, Prime Minister Binyamin
Netanyahu commented that this episode showed Iran’s true colors, in contrast to
its diplomatic posture in nuclear negotiations with the West. Defense Minister
Moshe Ya’alon said that Iran is again exposed as the biggest arms exporter in
the world to terrorist organizations. March 6….(The Fiscal Times) As the
eyes of the world and the media turn to Ukraine, Syrian President Bashar al
Assad has quietly been making momentous gains in his three-year civil war with
rebels that all but assure he will leave office on his own terms. Assad’s army
has taken Yabroud, the last major town held by Sunni Muslim rebels, located near
the Lebanese border. On Tuesday, with support from Hezbollah fighters and local
paramilitary groups, Assad’s forces bombarded the town until the rebels
retreated. Taking Yabroud is an important victory for Assad, who has been
fighting for months to control the surrounding region.. He has now effectively
cut off rebel supply lines from Lebanon. The victory also comes as Syria
continues to delay plans to destroy its chemical weapons. The Organization for
the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons says Syria has now submitted one-third of
its chemical weapons for destruction, far behind the schedule set in
negotiations with the United States and its allies last fall. Under that
agreement, Syria was supposed to have handed over all of its deadliest agents by
Jan. 1, with the rest of the weapons gone by Feb. 6. Syria blamed the delay on
the ongoing civil war, an argument that western officials have dismissed. “Every
indication we have is that there is no legitimate reason why that (removal) is
not happening now," Secretary of State John Kerry said when the delays were
announced. "We want the Syrian regime to live up to its obligations and it is
critical that very rapidly all those chemical weapons are moved from their 12 or
so sites to the one site in the port (of Latakia) to be prepared for shipment
out of Syria.” Assad’s victory, his continued slaughter of those who oppose him,
his repeated human rights violations, his failure to live up to the terms of the
deal, and his undermining of the peace talks amount to a stunning defeat of
American diplomacy. Nearly 50,000 people have died since the United States
confirmed the use of chemical weapons last summer, bringing the total number of
casualties to more than 140,000. Taken
together, this also represents a clear victory for Bashar al Assad. He has
accomplished every goal he had when the United States and its partners ignored
the so-called “red line” and allowed the war to continue without
intervention. He has defeated the rebels, splitting them into warring factions.
He still has the majority of his chemical weapons. He is still in
power, and with negotiations stalled, it’s unlikely he’ll be removed. In
short, he’s won. “You have one Al Qaeda faction fighting another Al Qaeda
faction. That’s how fractured this is. One sharp sliver fighting another sharp
sliver. I bring no good news to you tonight about Syria. The Syrian opposition
itself has done a miserable job distinguishing itself from the Al Qaeda
elements. There are some really bad people in Syria right now, Netantanyahu Lectures Obama on Peace
Stalemate March 5….(Jerusalem Post) Prime
Minister Binyamin Netanyahu met with US President Barack Obama in the Oval
Office on Monday, pushing back against pressure from the White House to swiftly
cut a deal with the Palestinians as the president warned time was running out
for peace. “Israel has been doing its part, and I regret to say that the
Palestinians haven’t,” Netanyahu said to Obama, in front of the press. “The
people of Israel know that it’s the case.” “What we want is peace, not a piece
of paper,” he said. Netanyahu
called for a “real peace, based on mutual recognition,” and chided his
Palestinian counterparts for promoting “incessant violence” against the Jewish
State. “Israel, the Jewish state, is the realization of the Jewish people’s
right to self-determination,” Netanyahu said. “I think it’s about time they
recognized a nation state for the Jewish people. We’ve only been here for about
4,000 years.” Netanyahu is the first Israeli prime minister to formally call on
the Palestinians to recognize Israel as the Jewish homeland, what he has called
the “minimal requirement” for peace. “The only peace that will endure is a peace
that we can defend,” he added. US Secretary
of State John Kerry and Vice President Joe Biden stood in the room as the two
leaders spoke. Netanyahu thanked Kerry for his efforts over the past several
months, which he called “tireless.” “When I say tireless,” he quipped, “I mean
tireless.” Negotiations have been led by Kerry, who planned a major address to
the American Israel Public Affairs Committee for Tuesday night. US officials
said Kerry delayed a strategically pivotal trip to Kiev, Ukraine’s capital, to
make sure he was in Washington for the speech. AIPAC officials expect him to
make a forceful case for a two-state accord, and said he would “flesh out”
comments he made recently on the fallout Israel would face should peace talks
fail with the Palestinians. A nine-month deadline on talks set by the US will
expire next month, unless all parties agree to extend negotiations. The prime
minister held meetings on Capitol Hill after sitting with Obama, Biden and
members of the president’s national security team at the White House. Netanyahu,
too, is scheduled to address AIPAC on Wednesday morning. Obama praised
Netanyahu for participating in “very lengthy, painstaking negotiations” over the
course of eight months, and recognized that Israel would not accept a peace
accord that failed to recognize its strategic security needs. “It’s my belief
that ultimately it is still possible to create two states, a Jewish state of
Israel and a state of Palestine in which people are living side by side in peace
and security. But it’s difficult and it requires compromise on all sides. And I
just want to publicly again commend the prime minister for the seriousness with
which he’s taken these discussions,” said Obama. “The time frame that we have
set up for completing these negotiations is coming near and some tough decisions
are going to have to be made. But I know that, regardless of the outcome, the
prime minister will make those decisions based on his absolute commitment to
Israel’s security and his recognition that ultimately Israel’s security will be
enhanced by peace with his neighbors.” The meeting
came as the White House found itself consumed by a rare conflict outside the
Middle East. The leaders both expressed concern with developments in Ukraine,
though Netanyahu was hesitant to remark publicly on the crisis. Russian military
officials pressured their Ukrainian counterparts in the occupied region of
Crimea on Tuesday to stand down their forces, threatening a military storm and
full Russian annexation of the territory. NATO Issues Warning to Russia March 4….(In The Days) Ukraine has
mobilized for war amid warnings from NATO that Russia’s annexation of Crimea
“threatens peace and security in Europe”. With tension nearing boiling point,
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO Secretary General, vowed the organization would
stand by Ukraine, a nation of 46 million which occupies a vital strategic
position between Europe and Russia. Speaking before he chaired an emergency
meeting of ambassadors from the 28 Nato member states, he said: “Russia must
stop its military activities and its threats.” The United
States dramatically intensified pressure on Moscow, threatening to remove Russia
from the G8 club of developed economies. John Kerry, the US Secretary of State,
condemned Russia for what he called an “incredible act of aggression” and
threatened “very serious repercussions”, including Russia’s possible expulsion
from the G8. “You don’t just, in the 21st century, behave in 19th century
fashion by invading another country on a completely trumped-up pretext,” he
said. Mr. Kerry
announced a surprise trip to Kiev this week in a show of support for the
embattled leadership, as Washington and its allies strongly criticized Moscow
for violating Ukraine’s sovereignty. In what is Moscow’s biggest confrontation
with the West since the Cold War, Russian troops on Sunday tightened their grip
on Crimea, the Ukrainian territory which has historic links to Russia and is
home to Russia’s Black Sea fleet. “Russia chose this brazen act of aggression.
If Russia wants to be a G8 country, it needs to behave like a G8 country,” he
continued. “Putin may find himself with asset freezes on Russian business,
American business may pull back, there may be a further tumble of the ruble,”
added Kerry. He said that Moscow still had a “right set of choices” to defuse
the crisis. Otherwise, G8 countries and other nations were prepared to “to go to
the hilt to isolate Russia”. March 4….(Sky
News) Russian troops and their local allies have already largely taken
control of Crimea, a restive province of Ukraine that belonged to Russia until
1954 and remains predominantly pro-Russian. Russia is in "operational control"
of Crimea as its soldiers surround Ukrainian troops and seized a ferry port.
Speaking at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva later, Mr. Lavrov said Russian
troops were necessary in Ukraine "until the normalization of the political
situation" and dismissed threats of sanctions and boycotts. He added: "We call
for a responsible approach, to put aside geopolitical calculations, and above
all to put the interests of the Ukrainian people first." Chinese
foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang said: "China has always upheld the
principles of diplomacy and the fundamental norms of international relations.
"At the same time we also take into consideration the history and the current
complexities of the Ukrainian issue." Ukrainian
prime minister Arseny Yatseniuk has insisted his country "will never give up
Crimea to anyone" and urged Russian forces to withdraw. Mr Yatseniuk said: "I
was and am a supporter of a diplomatic solution to the crisis, as a conflict
would destroy the foundations for stability in the whole region." In an
interview with Sky News, Foreign Secretary William Hague said the crisis is
likely to take some time to resolve. He said: "I think we probably are looking
at a long period of very active diplomacy and looking for solutions to this
since there is no sign of a change in the Russian position on this. As the tense
stand-off continues, the other seven nations of the G8 urged Moscow to hold
talks with Kiev. "We, the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the
United Kingdom and the United States and the President of the European Council
and President of the European Commission, join together today to condemn the
Russian Federation's clear violation of the sovereignty and territorial
integrity of Ukraine," they said in a statement. "We have decided for the time
being to suspend our participation in activities associated with the preparation
of the scheduled G8 Summit in Sochi in June." British
Foreign Secretary William Hague, who is in Kiev for talks on the crisis, said
Russia has taken operational control of Crimea. He described Russia's
intervention in Ukraine as the biggest crisis in Europe in the 21st century. At
a news conference with Mr. Yatseniuk, Mr Hague said: "If this situation cannot
resolve itself, if Russia cannot be persuaded to respect the sovereignty and
territorial integrity of Ukraine, there will have to be other consequences and
other costs." Hague added: "The UK is not discussion military action, our
concentration is on diplomatic and economic pressure." Prime
Minister David Cameron will later chair a meeting of the National Security
Council on the "British and international response to the grave situation in
Ukraine", where he will press for a European summit on the crisis. European
foreign ministers are holding an emergency meeting on Ukraine in Brussels to
table a joint response to the military incursion. Mr. Yatseniuk
heads a pro-Western government that took power in the former Soviet republic
when its Moscow-backed president, Viktor Yanukovych, was ousted last week. In
Moscow, Russian lawmakers also asked Mr. Putin to recall the country's
ambassador to the US. Russia's fleet has ordered Ukraine's forces in the
disputed Crimea Peninsula to surrender by 5 a.m. local time or face “a real
assault,” according to a statement from a Navy commander. “If they do not
surrender before 5am tomorrow, a real assault will be started against units and
divisions of the armed forces across Crimea," Russia’s Black Sea Fleet Commander
Alexander Vitko told the Interfax news agency Monday Putin Spurns Obama’s Call to
De-escalate In Ukraine, With fallout on Mid East March 3….(DEBKA) It took US
President Barack Obama 90 minutes of intense dialogue with the Russian president
to grasp that Vladimir Putin is unshakably fixed on the course he has set for
Ukraine and has no intention of withdrawing the Russian troops he has positioned
in the Crimean peninsula. In fact, behind the diplomatic verbiage, Putin was
clearly on the offensive. Putin let it be understood that unless the US and
Europe rid Kiev of the “fascist gangs,” which had taken over, Moscow would move
forces into additional parts of Ukraine to uphold its interests and “protect
the Russian citizens and compatriots living there” for as long as the interim
regime remained in Kiev. Not a shot has so far been fired in the Russian
military takeover of Crimea. This could change very rapidly and deteriorate into
a head-on clash between Russian and anti-Russian elements on Ukraine soil. Putin
was not impressed by Obama’s accusation of being in ”clear violation of
Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity." Neither was he deterred by the
US president’s threat of “international political and diplomatic isolation,” or
even a Western boycott of the G8 summer summit in Sochi. After all, he
stood alone at the opening and closing ceremonies of the Sochi Olympic Winter
Games, unattended by a single Western leader. After that experience, he is not
afraid to stand alone on Ukraine as well, regardless of US and EU efforts to
force him to abandon what he views as an imminent strategic threat on Russia’s
doorstep. So the West would be more productively served by leaning hard on the
group of assorted protesters who seized power in Kiev and get them to step
aside, or else seek an understanding with Moscow. Military brinkmanship will get
them nowhere. The basis of
an understanding already exists. It was signed and sealed on Feb. 21, the day
before the pro-Western coup in Kiev, in a deal with Viktor Yanukovich, brokered
by the German, French and Polish foreign ministers, for a unity government, an
early election and a new constitution curbing the president’s authority. That
deal was endorsed by Moscow as well as Washington. However, as time goes and
the escalation continues, that deal will fade, along with the chances of a
non-violent resolution of the Ukraine conflict. Therefore, the US-EU tactic of turning
the heat on Moscow is not just an exercise in futility; it is proving to be a
major strategic blunder stemming from weakness, which now threatens to promote
real violence and bloodshed. The Interim government’s security council chief
Sunday, March 2 announced a general mobilization of Ukraine’s 1 million
reservists after placing the army on a combat footing. This step was virtually
useless in practical terms while providing Putin with further impetus to
continue his military expansion. He knows that the Kiev administration is broke,
so how can it feed, equip, arm and provide transport for hundreds of thousands
of troops? And does anyone know how many are loyal to the new regime? Belatedly,
the interim government appealed to the West for help This grossly
uneven confrontation takes place under the critical gaze 2,000 km away in the
eastern Mediterranean and 3,500 km away in the Persian Gulf of the leaders of
Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Syria, and Hizballah in Lebanon. They may be
said to share four significant conclusions: 1. President
Obama is seen, once again backing off a commitment to US allies for the
second time in eight months. They remember his U-turn last August on US military
intervention for the removal of Syrian President Bashar Assad for using chemical
weapons. They also see Washington shying off from Russia’s use of military force
and therefore not a reliable partner for safeguarding their national security. 2. The Middle East governments which
opted to range with Vladimir Putin, Damascus, Tehran, Hizballah and, up to an
initial point, Egypt, are ending up on the strong side of the regional equation.
The pro-American camp keeps falling back. 3. American
weakness and lack of leadership on the global front has strengthened the
Iranian-Syrian bloc and its ties with Hizballah. 4. Putin standing foursquare behind Iran
is an insurmountable obstacle to a negotiated and acceptable comprehensive
agreement with Iran, just as the international bid for a political resolution of
the Syrian conflict foundered last month. With the
Ukraine crisis looming ever larger, Israel’s Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s
scheduled meeting Monday with President Obama at the White House is unlikely to
be more than an exchange of polite platitudes. March 3….(YNET)
The American ability to protect Israel against global isolation is waning,
US President Barack Obama said in an interview published Sunday, in particular
if the Palestinians decide that there is no chance for them to achieve
statehood. “If Palestinians come to believe that the possibility of a contiguous
sovereign Palestinian state is no longer within reach, then our ability to
manage the international fallout is going to be limited," Obama told Jeffrey
Goldberg on Thursday in an hour-long Oval Office meeting. Obama said
that he would warn Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in their meeting Monday
that time is running out for Israel as a democracy with a Jewish majority, and
would make the case that Netanyahu alone "has the strength and political
credibility to lead his people away from the precipice." Netanyahu
left Israel on Sunday for a five-day trip to the US. On Monday, he will meet
with Obama at the White House, and on Tuesday he will deliver a keynote speech
at the annual policy conference of pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, also in Washington
DC. The president touched on the issue of Israel's settlement construction,
which has long been labeled by the Palestinians as key to the success or failure
of peace talks; for years the US has attempted to slow down or even freeze the
pace of Israeli construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The Netanyahu
government insists that the construction has no real impact on the peace talks,
but Obama made clear that he disagreed. We have seen more aggressive settlement
construction over the last couple years than we’ve seen in a very long time,”
Obama said. The US is the
driving force behind the current negotiations between Israel and the
Palestinians, with Secretary of State John Kerry taking the lead. Obama took a
caustic tone when he referred to the Israeli leadership's perceived antipathy
over the talks. Obama's comments to Goldberg were almost an echo of remarks by
Kerry in recent weeks, which elicited a furious reaction from some of
Netanyahu's most senior ministers. If Netanyahu
“does not believe that a peace deal with the Palestinians is the right thing to
do for Israel", Obama said, "then he needs to articulate an alternative approach
(and) It’s hard to come up with one that’s plausible.” Obama
continuously pointed to issue of time "there comes a point where you can’t
manage this anymore, and then you start having to make very difficult choices,”
Obama said. “Do you resign yourself to what amounts to a permanent occupation of
the West Bank?" he posited. "Is that the character of Israel as a state for a
long period of time? Do you perpetuate, over the course of a decade or two
decades, more and more restrictive policies in terms of Palestinian movement? Do
you place restrictions on Arab-Israelis in ways that run counter to Israel’s
traditions?” The president even quoted Jewish sage Rabbi Hillel, saying that he
intends to tell Netanyahu that: “If not now, when? And if not you, Mr. Prime
Minister, then who?” (Sellout crowd
attends LGBT fundraiser on military base) March 3….(WND)
Almost seven decades after being the scene of one of the most ferocious and
protracted battles of World War II, a site of legendary valor and sacrifice on
the part of American soldiers, some US service personnel stationed in Okinawa
today are treating the world to another kind of display: “Gay” and lesbian
service personnel performing in drag, to raise funds for their activities, to a
sellout audience. As reported Sunday, openly homosexual service members at
Okinawa’s Kadena Air Base took to the stage and performed as “drag queens” and
“drag kings” Saturday “on a military installation in support of lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender troops.” According to
the story by Stars and Stripes, which has published news for the military
community continuously since WWII, “six service members, gay, lesbian and
straight, donned heavy makeup to dance and lip sync songs such as ‘I Wanna Dance
with Somebody’ for a raucous capacity crowd at the Rocker NCO Club at Kadena Air
Base. The event was a fundraiser for the recently formed Okinawa chapter of
OutServe-SLDN, which is the largest nonprofit advocate for the military’s
LGBT community.” Participants and audience alike were reportedly surprised
at the huge response to the event. Navy Lt. Marissa Greene, co-chapter leader of
OutServe Okinawa, said, “We didn’t think there was much of a desire for an event
like this on the island but it has actually blown up,” according to the report.
Though anticipating selling only about 75 tickets, “We ended up selling 400
tickets in 10 days,” she added. Commenting on the radical culture shift within
the military, Stars and Stripes observed that “just a few years ago, gay and
lesbian drag performances on a military base would have been unthinkable and
potentially a cause for dismissal from the service.” It added, “The repeals
of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, as well as the Defense of Marriage Act,
the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages,
have allowed gays and lesbians in the military to be open with their sexuality
for the first time.” In September 2011, on the implementation of the repeal
of the Clinton-era Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, President Obama said: “I was
proud to sign the Repeal Act into law last December because I knew that it would
enhance our national security, increase our military readiness, and bring us
closer to the principles of equality and fairness that define us as Americans.”
However, latest reports are that the rate of
sexual assaults, and especially male-on-male sexual assaults, in the US military
has skyrocketed. “So we’ve got a male-on-male problem here,” says Elaine
Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness. However, the
Department of Defense doesn’t want to comment on this new problem in the ranks.
FOJ Note:
After destroying our Christian based heritage, our
moral-based society, and changing our republican form of government into a
Socialist State, the leftist liberals and anti-God social engineers are
effeminizing and defanging our military. Our once proud nation is primed for a
fall. Our National Security is being compromised for the sake of the rights of
debauchery!
|